ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1811|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请问新东方逻辑section2-5题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-5-26 20:09:00 | 只看该作者

请问新东方逻辑section2-5题

5. The city’s public transportation system should be removed from the jurisdiction of the municipal government, which finds it politically impossible either to raise fares or to institute cost-saving reductions in service. If public transportation were handled by a private firm, profits would be vigorously pursued, thereby eliminating the necessity for covering operating costs with government funds.


The statements above best support the conclusion that


(A) the private firms that would handle public transportation would have experience in the transportation industry


(B) political considerations would not prevent private firms from ensuring that revenues cover operating costs


(C) private firms would receive government funding if it were needed to cover operating costs


(D) the public would approve the cost-cutting actions taken by the private firm


(E) the municipal government would not be resigned to accumulating merely enough income to cover costs


大家帮我解释一下答案B吗?郁闷了好久......谢谢大家了!


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-5-26 20:09:24编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2004-5-27 13:29:00 | 只看该作者
你哪里不明白了?先说说你的想法吧。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-5-27 16:56:00 | 只看该作者

用排除法,我可以确定选B,可是,对于B的意思,我有些不太理解。

dashasha,could you take a look at it for me?thank you!
地板
发表于 2004-5-28 02:44:00 | 只看该作者
原文说因为政府受政治因素制约不能作这作那来提高利润,所以政府应该把公共交通系统交给私人企业来管,因为私人企业可以追求利润,问能得到什么结论。B是说政治因素不会影响私人企业追求利润,如果没有B的说法,那么原文肯定就不对了啊。
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-5-28 19:14:00 | 只看该作者
我有点不明白that revenues cover operating costs的意思,谢谢dashasha帮我回复帖子。如果你忙就别回帖了,毕竟这个语言点不是这题的关键所在。谢谢啦,dashasha
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-1 03:10
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部