ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3025|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教大全-11-6

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-5-13 06:49:00 | 只看该作者

请教大全-11-6

6.     F: We ought not to test the safety of new drugs on sentient animals, such as dogs and rabbits. Our benefit means their pain, and they are equal to us in the capacity to feel pain.


G: We must carry out such tests; otherwise, we would irresponsibly sacrifice the human lives that could have been saved by the drugs.


Which of the following, if true, is the best objection that could be made from F’s point of view to counter G’s point?


(A) Even though it is not necessary for people to use cosmetics, cosmetics are also being tested on sentient animals.


(B) Medical science already has at its disposal a great number of drugs and other treatments for serious illnesses.


(C) It is not possible to obtain scientifically adequate results by testing drugs in the test tube, without making tests on living tissue.


(D) Some of the drugs to be tested would save human beings from great pain.E


(E) Many tests now performed on sentient animals can be performed equally well on fertilized chicken eggs that are at a very early stage of development.


我一直在A, E之间忧郁, 请问, A为什么不如E呢? 应该是怎样的思路去判断呢


沙发
发表于 2004-5-13 11:04:00 | 只看该作者

这题你大概想多了

a并不能否定G说的话,因为,如果it is necessary for people to use cosmetics,那企不是就应了G说的吗?就必须找个动物来试试了。

e很好的解决了测试问题,既然又可以达到测试的效果,又可以不用小动物,这不就使得G的方法没有理论依据了吗,削弱的效果很明显。

板凳
发表于 2005-7-1 10:32:00 | 只看该作者
thanks
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-12-14 09:45
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部