- UID
- 1692
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2003-4-1
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
重问LSAT-4-3-19
17. Being articulate has been equated with having a large vocabulary. Actually, however, people with large vocabularies have no incentive for, and tend not to engage in, the kind of creative linguistic self-expression that is required when no available words seem adequate. Thus a large vocabulary is a hindrance to using language in a truly articulate way.
Which one of the following is an assumption made in the argument?
(A) When people are truly articulate, they have the capacity to express themselves in situations in which their vocabularies seem inadequate.
(B) People who are able to express themselves creatively in new situations have little incentive to acquire large vocabularies.
(C) The most articulate people are people who have large vocabularies but also are able to express themselves creatively when the situation demands it.
(D) In educating people' to be more articulate, it would be futile to try to increase the size of their vocabularies.
(E) In unfamiliar situations, even pe0ple with large Vocabularies often do not have Specifically suitable words available.
答案：A，不明白A为什么是假设
2、原文的结论是这是一个典型的“能不能的问题”。原文的结论是大的词汇量是清晰表达的障碍，A就是当能够说清楚的时候，他们有能力表达....
举个例子这是gwd经常说的：joy在写字。这个结论的assumption可以是：joy有能力写字
还是不大明白A为什么是假设 ？能否讲讲？谢了。
|
|
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2003-5-21 18:56:00
楼主