ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 865|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助一道逻辑题,谢谢!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-5-31 15:33:30 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
T-9-Q3
Business Consultant: some corporations shun[ the use of executive titles because they fear that the use of titles indicating position in the corporation tends to inhibit communication up and down the corporate hierarchy. Since an executive who uses a title is treated with more respect by outsiders, however, use of a title can facilitate an executive’s dealings with external businesses. The obvious compromise is for these executives to use their corporate titles externally but not internally, since even if it is widely known that the corporation’s executives use executive titles outside their organization, this knowledge does not by itself inhibit communication within the corporation.

In the consultant’s reasoning, the two portions in boldfaceplay which of the following roles?

A.The first presents an obstacle to achieving a certain goal; the second presents a reason for considering that goal to be undesirable.

B.The first is a consideration that has led to the adoption of a certain strategy; the second presents a reason against adopting that strategy.

C.The first describes a concern that the consultant dismisses as insignificant; the second is a consideration that serves as the basis for that dismissal.

D.The first is a belief for which the consultant offers support; the second is part of that support.

E.The first is a belief against which evidence is offered; the second is part of the evidence offered against that belief.

答案给的B,不明白!第二句不是在however后面,那应该是支持文章的啊!大家帮忙看看,谢谢!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-5-31 20:25:50 | 只看该作者
主要就是B和C之间选择吧

B: The first is a consideration that has led to the adoption ofa certain strategy; the second presents a reason against adopting that strategy.

a certain strategy指的是some corporations shunt the use of executive titles;a consideration指的是they fear that the use of titles indicating position in the corporation tends to inhibit communication up and down the corporate hierarchy.

由however可知:前反后支;结论就是要说明这个strategy不对,即结论是against adopting that strategy

use of a title can facilitate an executive’s dealings with external businesses 就是支持结论的reason.


C:The first describes a concern that the consultant dismisses as insignificant; the second is a consideration that serves as the basis for that dismissal.

错在"insignificant”, 因为however后面的内容并没有指出这个concern是insignificant的,相反还认为这个concern本身是没错的,但是仅仅限于 if these executives use their  corporate  internally.

The obvious compromise is for these executives to use their corporate titles externally but not internally,  由“compromise ”(折衷)可以看出,use their corporate titles externally but not internally 则可以解决这个concern.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-7 15:03
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部