大全20-8

gracezz · 发表于 2010-4-30 14:47:03

Any serious policy discussion about acceptable levels of risk in connection with explosions is not well served if the participants fail to use the word “explosion” and use the phrase “energetic disassembly” instead. In fact, the word “explosion” elicits desirable reactions, such as a heightened level of attention, whereas the substitute phrase does not. Therefore, of the two terms, “explosion” is the one that should be used throughout discussions of this sort.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?

(A) In the kind of discussion at issue, the advantages of desirable reactions to the term “explosion” outweigh the drawbacks, if any, arising from undesirable reactions to that term.

(B) The phrase “energetic disassembly” has not so far been used as a substitute for the word “explosion” in the kind of discussion at issue.

(C) In any serious policy discussion, what is said by the participants is more important than how it is put into words.

(D) The only reason that people would have for using “energetic disassembly” in place of “explosion” is to render impossible any serious policy discussion concerning explosions.（A）

(E) The phrase “energetic disassembly” is not necessarily out of place in describing a controlled rather than an accidental explosion.
没看明白这题。。。。。

gracezz · 发表于 2010-4-30 14:50:52

因为E能引起有用的反应，而ED不能，所以只能用E。

A现在我明折取非后结论不成立，因为如果E引起的不良的反应要比有用的反应多的话，当然不能用E，但是做题的时候没有反应过来。。。。

请问大家对这题的思路是怎样的？

lonelyunited · 发表于 2010-7-22 22:50:27

我也对这个题目不太理解……希望哪位大牛点拨一下……

wangsiwei · 发表于 2010-7-22 23:10:38

我试试哈。
楼主分析的挺对的。我加一点。文章有一个潜在的意思就是为了达到想要的效果，就要用E。
对于这种打算作什么的假设题型，通常是要去掉可能发生的别的结果。
A就很婉转的去掉了不好的结果－－就算发生不好的结果，对于好的结果来说不算什么，所以可以忽视可能产生的不好的结果了，等同于eliminate 了。

大全20-8

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

浏览过的版块