67. It has always been difficult to understand the basis of politics in the People’s Republic of China. Because the system is effectively closed, it is impossible to know with any degree of confidence who is allied with whom and for what reasons. Yet Chinese politics does exhibit many of the external characteristics of factional political systems, as found in more open societies. It is legitimate to conclude, therefore, that China has a factional political system.
Which one of the following, if true, would confirm the author’s conclusion that China has a factional political system?
A. All open political systems are factional political systems. B. All factional political systems are closed political systems. C. All closed political systems are factional political systems. D. China’s political system is more open than many existing factional political systems. E. China’s political system is more closed than all existing factional political systems.
令我迷惑的是原文中有说 Yet Chinese politics does exhibit many of the external characteristics of factional political systems, as found in more open societies. 从而表示factional political systems是open societies的特质。但前面又有说Because the system is effectively closed。 这段话到底是说CHINA open还是closed呢?
这题还是不懂啊~既然说China有很多open的特征,然后因此得出China是个 factional political system,那么open特征应该在推断中起到一定作用吧。按C的答案 All closed political systems are factional political systems. 只要知道China是closed就好了啊,后面的全是废话不是?
这题还是不懂啊~既然说China有很多open的特征,然后因此得出China是个 factional political system,那么open特征应该在推断中起到一定作用吧。按C的答案 All closed political systems are factional political systems. 只要知道China是closed就好了啊,后面的全是废话不是?
-- by 会员 aaintw (2011/5/29 10:06:49)
对这题我有点小看法 前提1;system is closed in China 前提2:但是和很多open societies的一些特征一样,中国的外部特征有factional political systems 结论:中国是factional political system 如果没有前提1,直接是中国和一些open society一样有factional political systems的特征,所以说中国是factional political system;但是有前提1,所以在用前提2去推结论的时候,出现了yet这个表示轻微转折的词,体现出了不确定性 题目要求加强确定性,也就是改变前提1对后面结论造成的不确定性 答案c 直接建立前提1和后面结论的关系,使得结论被confirm,也就是减少了yet 这个不确定的语气