The mainstream entrepreneurship research focuses on the individual-level, which includes opportunity (Shane & Vankataraman, 2000), Cognition (Bandura, 1986; Chen et al., 1998), and affect (Baron 2008). Other streams of entrepreneurship studies include process (Aldrich, 1999; Gartner, 1988) and the firm-level entrepreneurship. The latter became so-called corporate entrepreneurship in the eyes of entrepreneurship scholars or strategic entrepreneurship in the eyes of strategy scholars. SEJ would become a very good journal, I believe, as Michael Hitt and Jay Barney both serve on the editorial board. VC and PE are far away from the mainstream e-ship literature. In fact, I have a conference paper on VCs, but my advisor, who is a field editor of JBV, does not like it. One of the problems that research on VC usually encounters is its lack of theoretical ground. Many VC papers do not stem from theories or contribute to any theory, which is a big problem in the domain of entrepreneurship as well as in management.
VC. PE不是很了解,那些事创业融资的手段。但是ETP等主流entrepreneurship期刊的主要研究方法和注重点是OB。entrepreneurial orientation经常与 LMX等OB常用的contruct在一个模型中。主要是组织管理的psychometrics而不是金融学的modeling的研究。如果单纯对VC PE感兴趣,是有点不一样的。 不过我是土人。不是很懂 -- by 会员 boum (2010/2/8 13:16:03)
-- by 会员 calebxu (2010/2/10 21:56:26)
感谢你的精彩解答。其实也不尽然,VC/PE可关注的角度很多,例如公司治理层面,公司控制权问题等。我们在做案例研究,合作者与SEJ的AE之一Wright是好朋友,所以有意投到那里。我本人是做金融不是做创业研究的,所以偏重了VC/PE和corporate governance。但你推荐的论文有时间当拜读。 |