ChaseDream
搜索
12
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: lianghao
打印 上一主题 下一主题

strategic entrepreneurship journal是什么档次?

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2010-2-9 07:43:53 | 只看该作者
应该是B或者below,是strategical management journal办的一个子刊。
我做ra的老师随便写写就已经发了。
12#
发表于 2010-2-10 21:56:26 | 只看该作者
The mainstream entrepreneurship research focuses on the individual-level, which includes opportunity (Shane & Vankataraman, 2000), Cognition (Bandura, 1986; Chen et al., 1998), and affect (Baron 2008). Other streams of entrepreneurship studies include process (Aldrich, 1999; Gartner, 1988) and the firm-level entrepreneurship. The latter became so-called corporate entrepreneurship in the eyes of entrepreneurship scholars or strategic entrepreneurship in the eyes of strategy scholars. SEJ would become a very good journal, I believe, as Michael Hitt and Jay Barney both serve on the editorial board.
VC and PE are far away from the mainstream e-ship literature. In fact, I have a conference paper on VCs, but my advisor, who is a field editor of JBV, does not like it. One of the problems that research on VC usually encounters is its lack of theoretical ground. Many VC papers do not stem from theories or contribute to any theory, which is a big problem in the domain of entrepreneurship as well as in management.
VC. PE不是很了解,那些事创业融资的手段。但是ETP等主流entrepreneurship期刊的主要研究方法和注重点是OB。entrepreneurial orientation经常与 LMX等OB常用的contruct在一个模型中。主要是组织管理的psychometrics而不是金融学的modeling的研究。如果单纯对VC PE感兴趣,是有点不一样的。
不过我是土人。不是很懂
-- by 会员 boum (2010/2/8 13:16:03)
13#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-2-11 12:44:20 | 只看该作者
The mainstream entrepreneurship research focuses on the individual-level, which includes opportunity (Shane & Vankataraman, 2000), Cognition (Bandura, 1986; Chen et al., 1998), and affect (Baron 2008). Other streams of entrepreneurship studies include process (Aldrich, 1999; Gartner, 1988) and the firm-level entrepreneurship. The latter became so-called corporate entrepreneurship in the eyes of entrepreneurship scholars or strategic entrepreneurship in the eyes of strategy scholars. SEJ would become a very good journal, I believe, as Michael Hitt and Jay Barney both serve on the editorial board.
VC and PE are far away from the mainstream e-ship literature. In fact, I have a conference paper on VCs, but my advisor, who is a field editor of JBV, does not like it. One of the problems that research on VC usually encounters is its lack of theoretical ground. Many VC papers do not stem from theories or contribute to any theory, which is a big problem in the domain of entrepreneurship as well as in management.
VC. PE不是很了解,那些事创业融资的手段。但是ETP等主流entrepreneurship期刊的主要研究方法和注重点是OB。entrepreneurial orientation经常与 LMX等OB常用的contruct在一个模型中。主要是组织管理的psychometrics而不是金融学的modeling的研究。如果单纯对VC PE感兴趣,是有点不一样的。
不过我是土人。不是很懂
-- by 会员 boum (2010/2/8 13:16:03)
-- by 会员 calebxu (2010/2/10 21:56:26)


感谢你的精彩解答。其实也不尽然,VC/PE可关注的角度很多,例如公司治理层面,公司控制权问题等。我们在做案例研究,合作者与SEJ的AE之一Wright是好朋友,所以有意投到那里。我本人是做金融不是做创业研究的,所以偏重了VC/PE和corporate governance。但你推荐的论文有时间当拜读。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-5 07:02
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部