ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 5030|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

陈向东逻辑里的两道假设题~~~~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-1-12 09:10:09 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
能够做了陈向东的逻辑,假设部分,正确率够低= =

有两道题目看了答案也不太理解它的逻辑过程

请教各位指点迷津~~

3Some people assert that prosecutors should be allowed to introduce illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials if the judge and jury can be persuaded that the arresting officer was not aware of violating or did not intend to violate the law while seizing the evidence. This proposed “good-faith exception” would weaken everyone’s constitutional protection, lead to less careful police practices, and promote lying by law enforcement officers in court.

The argument above for maintaining the prohibition against illegally obtained evidence assumes that:

A.      defendants in criminal cases should enjoy greater protection from the law than other citizens do.

B.      Law enforcement authorities need to be encouraged to pursue criminals assiduously.

C.      The legal system will usually find ways to ensure that real crimes do not go unprosecuted.

D.     The prohibition now deters some unlawful searches and seizures.

E.      Courts should consider the motives of law enforcement officers in deciding whether evidence brought for forward by the officers is admissible in a trial.

答案是D

我选的是C

现在看看C确实是不太对,想问D的逻辑是怎样的?



7Last year, support for the social and behavioral sciences represent only about three percent of the government’s total budget for research funds in the United States. Thus, the particularly sharp reductions imposed on such programs this year seem dictated not by financial constraints but by social philosophy.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the conclusion of the passage above is based?

A.      The government funds allocated for research in the social and behavioral sciences are not sufficient for the work that needs to be done.

B.      The social and behavioral sciences are as valuable as the physical and biological sciences.

C.      The current reductions will stop research in the social and behavioral sciences.

D.     Government funding is the primary source of research money in the United States.

E.      Three percent is an insignificant portion of the government’s total budget for research funds.

答案是E,我选的是D

我觉得D是个不错的答案,排除了其他因素对于社会科学的支持。。。

不能理解答案~~~E不是应该是加强吗?我觉得~~

PS:陈向东的书里是不是有一些答案是错的?还是我水平问题,理解不了正确答案?

谢谢诸位~~~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-1-12 10:00:45 | 只看该作者
3、原来我跟你错的一样,后来一想,D的确是最准确的!C就是答非所问!
题目的信息,就是两部分:1)有些人提出“introduce illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials”的想法;2)这种想法带来的种种坏处;
问题:对于这种想法,我们为什么要“maintain the prohibition”?
答案D:那是因为“Prohibition能干。。。。”,也就是指出“prohibition”的好处;
答案C:那是说“人家legal system 能干。。。”,反过来问自己一句,“legal system能干...”跟"prohibition"有什么关系啊?


7、对于D答案,你可以反问自己一句:“Government funding is the primary source”,这个条件我肯定了。要是“three percent of the government’s total budget”是个天文数字,远远多于research所需要的,那么就算sharp reducation,那对我不一定会有啥影响。
E答案: “an insignificant portion”强调,这个Three percent少的可怜!
板凳
发表于 2010-2-19 12:24:19 | 只看该作者
能够做了陈向东的逻辑,假设部分,正确率够低= =

有两道题目看了答案也不太理解它的逻辑过程

请教各位指点迷津~~

3Some people assert that prosecutors should be allowed to introduce illegally obtained
evidence in criminal trials if the judge and jury can be persuaded that the arresting officer
was not aware of violating or did not intend to violate the law while seizing the evidence.
This proposed “good-faith exception” would weaken everyone’s constitutional protection, lead to less careful
police practices, and promote lying by law enforcement officers in court.


The argument above for maintaining the prohibition against illegally obtained evidence
assumes that:


A.      defendants in criminal cases should enjoy greater protection from the law than other citizens do.

B.      Law enforcement authorities need to be encouraged to pursue criminals assiduously.

C.      The legal system will usually find ways to ensure that real crimes do not go unprosecuted.

D.     The prohibition now deters some unlawful searches and seizures.

E.      Courts should consider the motives of law enforcement officers in deciding whether evidence brought for forward by the officers is admissible in a trial.

答案是D

我选的是C

现在看看C确实是不太对,想问D的逻辑是怎样的?

选D的理由是,题目里说“good-faith exception” would weaken everyone’s constitutional protection。反过来讲,如果不引入善意例外的原则,就不会weaken每个人的宪法保护。也就是说,现有的限制是保护了公民权利,即deters some unlawful searches and seizures.

7Last year, support for the social and behavioral sciences represent only about three
percent of the government’s total budget for research funds in the United States.
Thus, the particularly sharp reductions imposed on such programs this year seem
dictated not by financial constraints but by social philosophy.


Which of the following is an assumption on which the conclusion of the passage above is based?

A.      The government funds allocated for research in the social and behavioral sciences are not sufficient for the work that needs to be done.

B.      The social and behavioral sciences are as valuable as the physical and biological sciences.

C.      The current reductions will stop research in the social and behavioral sciences.

D.     Government funding is the primary source of research money in the United States.

E.      Three percent is an insignificant portion of the government’s total budget for research funds.

答案是E,我选的是D

我觉得D是个不错的答案,排除了其他因素对于社会科学的支持。。。

不能理解答案~~~E不是应该是加强吗?我觉得~~
选E的理由是,题目中提到the particularly sharp reductions imposed on such programs this year seem
dictated not by financial constraints but by social philosophy,急剧下降不是经济困难导致的。那么可以推出这3%对财政预算而言不算什么,即an insignificant portion。
而D的意思,从题目中完全推导不出来。




PS:陈向东的书里是不是有一些答案是错的?还是我水平问题,理解不了正确答案?

谢谢诸位~~~
-- by 会员 zj_cynthia (2010/1/12 9:10:09)
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-20 17:27
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部