费费-9求解！！

9. Astronauts who experience weightlessness frequently get motion sickness. The astronauts see their own motion relative to passing objects, but while the astronauts are weightless their inner ears indicate that their bodies are not moving. The astronauts’ experience is best explained by the hypothesis that conflicting information received by the brain about the body’s motion causes motion sickness.

Which one of the following, if true, provides the strongest additional support for the hypothesis above?

(A) During rough voyages ship passengers in cabins providing a view of the water are less likely to get motion sickness than are passengers in cabins providing no view.

(B) Many people who are experienced airplane passengers occasionally get motion sickness.

(C) Some automobile passengers whose inner ears indicate that they are moving and who have a clear view of the objects they are passing get motion sickness.

(D) People who have aisle seats in trains or airplanes are as likely to get motion sickness as are people who have window seats.

(E) Some astronauts do not get motion sickness even after being in orbit for several days.
            

大家帮忙看一下！！谢谢~~

为什么是A？怎么觉得A是削弱呢？

根据题意：

有冲突的信息->行动不便

对A)水做参照没有参入其他“杂质”比没有任何参照的可能性要低，所以支持；

对C)耳朵和眼睛都判断是在动，反而引起行动不便，这个倒是削弱。

A项中providing a view of the water 的人看得到船在动，内耳也感受得到船在动，信息一致就不容易得病；providing no view的人只能内耳感受得到船在动，去看不到船在动，信息不一致就更容易得病。

BE无关

C信息一致却得病，削弱

D信息一致的和信息不一致的得病概率相同，削弱（我已经分不清在窗口和在过道的哪个是信息一致哪个是信息不一致了，反正分不清楚不影响排除它）

我是想起来我小时候我妈妈说坐在窗口看外面就不容易晕车，就把晕车等同于motion sickness去思考，就很容易想明白A是对的了，我是觉得这样的思维过程是不严谨的，估计是瞎猫撞到死耗子。

非常感谢~~我明白了~~你分析的很详细~~