ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1373|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Lsat-18-2-6

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-3-9 23:03:00 | 只看该作者

Lsat-18-2-6



6。 A linguist recently argued that all human languages must have a common origin because some concepts are universal; that is, they appear in all languages. For example, all languages are capable of describing lightness and darkness.

Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument?

(A) The Burmese language does not contain basic nouns like automobile and airplane.

(B) No one linguist could possibly speak all known languages.

(C) All speakers, regardless of their languages, are confronted with similar stimuli like lightness and darkness.

(D) The similarity between human language and dolphin language has not been attributed to a common origin.(C)

(E) Some languages include concepts of which speakers of other languages are not even aware.

答案是C, 问为什么D不对?

C是提供了一个它因解释吗?但我觉得这个它因并不能否定common origin的存在啊?


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-12-4 07:50
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部