ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1555|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

郁闷,不理解,请帮我。

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-3-9 08:47:00 | 只看该作者

郁闷,不理解,请帮我。

The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an organization was circulated to its members for comment.fficeffice" />


When more than one nominee is to be named for an office, prospective nominees must consent to nomination and before giving such consent must be told who the other nominees will be.


Which of the following comments concerning the logic of the proposal is accurate if it cannot be known who the actual nominees are until prospective nominees have given their consent to be nominated?


(A) The proposal would make it possible for each of several nominees for an office to be aware of who all of the other nominees are.


(B) The proposal would widen the choice available to those choosing among the nominees.


(C) If there are several prospective nominees, the proposal would deny the last nominee equal treatment with the first.


(D) The proposal would enable a prospective nominee to withdraw from competition with a specific person without making that withdrawal known.E


(E) If there is more than one prospective nominee, the proposal would make it impossible for anyone to become a nominee.


每个单词都认识,就是不理解它在说什么,能否帮我翻译一下大概意思并解释一下,谢谢!

沙发
发表于 2004-3-9 09:20:00 | 只看该作者
大致是这样:


如果一个职位有多位被提名者(nominee),那么被提名者必须


1。同意自己被提名(consent to the nomination)


2。事先被告知其它被提名者是谁(be told who the other nominees will be)


问:如果只有到了所有的被提名者都同意自己被提名之后才知道被提名者都是谁,那么下面哪一项描述是准确的?


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-16 14:46
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部