- UID
- 17326
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2003-11-12
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
请教LSAT-24-1-22
22. To hold criminals responsible for their
crimes involves a failure to recognize that
criminal actions, like all actions, are
ultimately products of the environment that
forged the agent's character. It is not criminals
but people in the law-abiding majority who by
their actions do most to create and maintain this
environment. Therefore, it is law-abiding people
whose actions, and nothing else, make them alone
truly responsible for crime.
The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable
to criticism on the grounds that
(A) it exploits an ambiguity in the term 揺
nvironment" by treating two different meanings of
the word as though they were equivalent
B it fails to distinguish between actions that are socially
acceptable and actions that are socially
unacceptable
C the way it distinguishes criminals
from crimes implicitly denies that someone
becomes a criminal solely in virtue of having
committed a crime
D its conclusion is a
generalization of statistical evidence drawn from
only a small minority of the population
E its conclusion contradicts an implicit principle on
which an earlier part of the argument is based
答案E。 没想明白， its conclusion contradicts an implicit principle on
which an earlier part of the argument is based 粗体表示什么？
。
|
|
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2004-2-25 15:48:00
楼主
