还有两周就要考试了，我的逻辑还是一塌糊涂，人家说逻辑难度在阅读，但我发现我是看得懂，但就是思路是错的。比如下面这题：

雪E威胁到其它species。

有一个限令是限制人们hunting雪E的（雪E被HUNT到一定量就不准再HUNT了）。

放松这个限令可以使其它species recover

然后按我的思路，紧紧抓住结论，这个结论就是：雪E数下降，其它species就recover，然后要去削弱这个argument

按照这个思路，就非常痛苦地找不到正确答案，结果选了A，觉得至少沾边，说这个限令本来就是因为雪E数在不断急剧下降才定的，所以雪E数本来就已经很少了--觉得至少断了雪E数与其它species的这个联系。

结果看讨论，才知道思路完全错了。

正确的结论应该是：HUNTING与雪E数量的关系。削弱的是，就算放开手脚HUNT，也不会对雪E数量有什么影响。

思路完全错误！非常的痛苦。感觉原文里其它SPECIES的这一信息根本就是废的，无关的，我却把它看成了结论。

非常非常痛苦，只是举这样一个例子，我总是把握错结论，应该怎么办？！

1.         GWD-17-Q11

Some species of Arctic birds are threatened by recent sharp increases in the population of snow geese, which breed in the Arctic and are displacing birds of less vigorous species.  Although snow geese are a popular quarry for hunters in the southern regions where they winter, the hunting season ends if and when hunting has reduced the population by five percent, according to official estimates.  Clearly, dropping this restriction would allow the other species to recover.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?

1. Hunting limits for snow geese were imposed many years ago in response to a sharp decline in the population of snow geese.
2. It has been many years since the restriction led to the hunting season for snow geese being closed earlier than the scheduled date.
3. The number of snow geese taken by hunters each year has grown every year for several years.
4. As their population has increased, snow geese have recolonized wintering grounds that they had not used for several seasons.
5. In the snow goose’s winter habitats, the goose faces no significant natural predation.

My answer is E. Is that correct?

I don't think E is a perfect answer, but others are nonsensical to me either.

汗....我也是在郁闷CR

我分析的思路居然跟你一模一样,所以我也选了A

现在也在痛苦的纠正思路中

LZ啊，上回我发求助贴的时候你也回贴了。

米有想到这里又见着。而且我们的考试时间也差不多。而且！同样愁苦CR。

这道题我也做错了。一开始也是万分纠结，觉得完全没有答案嘛。还再三回头读题生怕自己哪里理解错误。

哎，真的如何是好啊。

对啊。救命啊。而且我看逻辑真的好吃力啊～

仔仔细细看10道题要花去几小时！

E should be the optimal choice .To undermine the argument ,

The population of snow geese increase will threaten bird population going decreasing. Dropping the restriction of hanting should cause more geeses to be shot by loose restriction. However, to undermine the argument, Unless are in winter habitat ( living zone) the geese are, the population of geese will no face no threaten by the hunters ,thus the population will not decrease via hunting.

Hope I am on the good track.

Some species of Arctic birds are threatened by recent sharp increases in the population of snow geese, which breed in the Arctic and are displacing birds of less vigorous species.  Although snow geese are a popular quarry for hunters in the southern regions where they winter, the hunting season ends if and when hunting has reduced the population by five percent, according to official estimates.  Clearly, dropping this restriction would allow the other species to recover.

 Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?

A.  Hunting limits for snow geese were imposed many years ago in response to a sharp decline in the population of snow geese.

B.  It has been many years since the restriction led to the hunting season for snow geese being closed earlier than the scheduled date.

C.  The number of snow geese taken by hunters each year has grown every year for several years.

D.  As their population has increased, snow geese have recolonized wintering grounds that they had not used for several seasons.

E.  In the snow goose’s winter habitats, the goose faces no significant natural predation.