ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 449|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助][求助]请教一道逻辑题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-5-1 23:23:00 | 只看该作者

[求助][求助]请教一道逻辑题

Exports of United States wood pulp will rise considerably during this
year. The reason for the rise is that the falling value of the dollar
will make it cheaper for paper manufacturers in Japan and Western
Europe to buy American wood pulp than to get it from any other source.

Which of the following is an assumption made in drawing the conclusion above?

(A) Factory output of paper products in Japan and Western Europe will increase sharply during this year.
(B)
The quality of the wood pulp produced in the United States would be
adequate for the purposes of Japanese and Western European paper
manufacturers.
(C) Paper manufactures in Japan and Western Europe
would prefer to use wood pulp produced in the United States if cost
were not a factor.
(D) Demand for paper products made in Japan and Western Europe will not increase sharply during this year.
(E) Production of wood pulp by United States companies will not increase sharply during this year.

这道题出自陈向东的《GMAT 逻辑推理》。


给出的答案是B, 但是我觉得是C。

希望大家给点意见,谢谢!

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2009-5-2 15:25:00 | 只看该作者
有哪位回答一下吗?
板凳
发表于 2009-5-2 17:46:00 | 只看该作者

对B取非显然削弱了题干的推理:如果US的wood pulp&nbsp;不符合manufacturers in Japan and Western Europe的要求,那么即便价格便宜他们也不会买US的wood pulp。 所以wood pulp&nbsp;出口增加的前提假设必须是其质量要求。</P>

C选项中说 if cost were not a factor,但是在该题中由于falling value of the dollar 已经造成了进口成本的降低,所以cost 已然成为一个factor 了,怎么能不考虑呢?当然更不能说是assumption 了。或者对C取非来考虑:“如果不考虑成本因素,Japan and Western Europe不会用US的wood pulp。”本题中成本是因素,那么 Japan and Western Europe就有可能用US的wood pulp, 显然取非不能削弱题干的推理。所以C不对

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-30 06:42
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部