In the ffice:smarttags" />United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.
Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:
(A) Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.
(B) Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the
event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.
(C) Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built
for the United States market.
(D) Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being
involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.
(E) States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no
reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.
D为什么没削弱?是因为与severe无关呢?还是have a greater statistical chance of指的是概率,未必发生?(后面这个解释是费费说的,但是我不大清楚是不是真是这个原因?)谢谢
[此贴子已经被作者于2004-2-19 0:32:22编辑过] |