ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1876|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

补充材料91

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-2-19 00:21:00 | 只看该作者

补充材料91

In the ffice:smarttags" />United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.



Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:



(A) Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.



(B) Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the



    event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.



(C) Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built



    for the United States market.



    (D) Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being



    involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.



(E) States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no



    reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.


D为什么没削弱?是因为与severe无关呢?还是have a greater statistical chance of指的是概率,未必发生?(后面这个解释是费费说的,但是我不大清楚是不是真是这个原因?)谢谢














[此贴子已经被作者于2004-2-19 0:32:22编辑过]
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2004-2-19 00:33:00 | 只看该作者
顺便问一下,行间距要怎么修改呀?


这样看起来让大家好费劲呀

板凳
发表于 2004-5-25 01:07:00 | 只看该作者
统计上的高发生率只是个事实, 它不是他因, 因为这种高发生率很有可能就是因为没带安全带导致的. 所以这不是削弱
地板
发表于 2004-5-25 06:18:00 | 只看该作者
我认为D是无关选项,原文是问INJURY SEVERITY,D是说INVOLVE IN事故的概率。
5#
发表于 2004-6-2 11:04:00 | 只看该作者
同意!概率的概念和程度的概念不能等同替换!
6#
发表于 2004-6-3 10:14:00 | 只看该作者
E?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-28 03:00
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部