ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1978|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教补充教材第17题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-2-17 22:53:00 | 只看该作者

请教补充教材第17题

    17.         Companies considering new cost-cutting manufacturing processes often compare the projected results of making the investment against the alternative of not making the investment with costs, selling prices, and share of market remaining constant.


Which of the following, assuming that each is a realistic possibility, constitutes the most serious disadvantage for companies of using the method above for evaluating the financial benefit of new manufacturing processes?


(A) The costs of materials required by the new process might not be known with certainty.


(B) In several years interest rates might go down, reducing the interest costs of borrowing money to pay for the investment.


(C) Some cost-cutting processes might require such expensive investments that there would be no net gain for many years, until the investment was paid for by savings in the manufacturing process.


(D) Competitors that do invest in a new process might reduce their selling prices and thus take market share away from companies that do not.D


(E) The period of year chosen for averaging out the cost of the investment might be somewhat longer or shorter, thus affecting the result.


the key: D. Who can explain it for me?


题目中的compare---with---怎么感觉怪怪的?


ths a lot!

沙发
发表于 2004-2-18 00:10:00 | 只看该作者
compare     against 不是compare with, with后介词短语表比较的伴随状态,相当一个前提条件,D正好否定了这个前提,也就否定了companies    use the method     for evaluating 这个结论。不知对否请指教。
板凳
发表于 2004-2-18 13:15:00 | 只看该作者
这题从意思上比较好理解


实际上这也就是商业中经常使用的机会成本的评估


既然是这种评估当然要假定很多条件是不变的,


而作为削弱,答案中就强调了在评估过程中有一个非常重要的条件发生了变化


这样一来,原文的逻辑就产生了和严重的问题

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2004-2-18 18:30:00 | 只看该作者
yeah, make sense!


thks!

5#
发表于 2004-2-18 20:07:00 | 只看该作者
AGREE
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-10 03:43
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部