Princeton模攷和實攷成績浮動

Claire · 发表于 2004-2-16 16:57:00

實在不太明白到底模攷准否

祈晴坊主 · 发表于 2004-2-16 19:43:00

我从不相信摸考

13917547 · 发表于 2004-2-16 19:51:00

如果平时作题就养成时间上的习惯的话,作模考基本上属于浪费时间!

t980402 · 发表于 2004-3-3 01:45:00

I get confused with PR's scores. the fewer errors I made, the lower score I got!!!!

In the latest test, I only got 600 with 2 math errors and 8 verbal errors, while in the CD, I saw someone post her's score as 730 with the same error rates. BTW, I didn't know how her errors distributed, but my errors are not concentrated in the first 20 either. Also, I got 650 with 3 math errors and 12 verbal errors, and most of whom are found in the first 20.

the most upset situation is I only got 610 with 0 math errors and 4 verbal errors!!!! So far, i totally lost. I can't figure out how PR does scoring.

I wish someone else could post their error distribution and total score for reference But now I just play around with PR and don't care it too much.

caterpillar · 发表于 2004-3-3 05:43:00

I get confused with the Kaplan's scores too. I made 8 mistakes in math, but got 50! I don't think I will be so lucky in a real test. My verbal scores is 32, but totally I only got 630. I suppose the total score should be higher if the verbal is 32 and maths is 50.

terp · 发表于 2004-3-3 08:14:00

作模考基本上属于浪费时间

on the contrary, I think computer simulation test is helpful. It helps you develop the pace in that 4 hours.

terp · 发表于 2004-3-3 08:17:00

I get confused with the Kaplan's scores too

In general, PR's score is closer to the real one than Kaplan's.

mxf288 · 发表于 2005-1-28 02:39:00

stick to PP3 practice. I don't believe in PR or Kaplan at all.

swordhere · 发表于 2005-1-29 18:37:00

有了GWD就不用PR和KA了吧我考前没做过KA R两次都是650 GWD一般6-10个错题目考试分数720——所以还是GWD比较准的

PS：以前我做完PR时也很郁闷，经过很多NN的点拨，最后终于完全放弃PR，专心做GWD

Princeton模攷和實攷成績浮動

Princeton模攷和實攷成績浮動

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

浏览过的版块