ChaseDream
搜索
1234
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 三个世界
打印 上一主题 下一主题

12.23 纽约770 感想+ JJ (12.24补充JJ)

[精华] [复制链接]
31#
发表于 2008-12-25 21:12:00 | 只看该作者

哈哈,我找到lz说的GWD逻辑原题了!!!GWD-TN-19里的,昨天刚好做过~~~

lz描述:

逻辑想起来一题,讲说在某某时期,有一条湖被污染得很严重,但是最近那个湖里的fish的数量又增加了因为industrial pollutants decline了,而且湖变得干净了。然后现在准备要在湖底建一条oil pipeline,然后就有些人害怕说这样可能会导致污染又变严重然后fish的数量又减少。However, 有一项技术which can prevent the leaks install了,所以,provided this technology is effective,那些害怕是不必要的。问上述的argument based on 哪一个assumption.

GWD原题:

9. GWD28-Q9:

Early in the twentieth century, Lake
                Konfa
became very polluted.  Recently fish populations have recovered as release of industrial pollutants has declined and the lake’s waters have become cleaner.  Fears are now being voiced that the planned construction of an oil pipeline across the lake’s bottom might revive pollution and cause the fish population to decline again.  However, a technology for preventing leaks is being installed.  Therefore, provided this technology is effective, those fears are groundless.

The argument depends on assuming which of the following?

A.      Apart from development related to the pipeline, there will be no new industrial development around the lake that will create renewed pollution in its waters.

B.       Other than the possibility of a leak, there is no realistic pollution threat posed to the lake by the pipeline’s construction.

C.      There is no reason to believe that the leak-preventing technology would be ineffective when installed in the pipeline in Lake
                Konfa
.

D.      Damage to the lake’s fish populations would be the only harm that a leak of oil from the pipeline would cause.

E.       The species of fish that are present in Lake
                Konfa
now are the same as those that were in the lake before it was affected by pollution.

此题答案为B~~~

32#
发表于 2008-12-25 21:12:00 | 只看该作者

哈哈,我找到lz说的GWD逻辑原题了!!!GWD-TN-19里的,昨天刚好做过~~~

lz描述:

逻辑想起来一题,讲说在某某时期,有一条湖被污染得很严重,但是最近那个湖里的fish的数量又增加了因为industrial pollutants decline了,而且湖变得干净了。然后现在准备要在湖底建一条oil pipeline,然后就有些人害怕说这样可能会导致污染又变严重然后fish的数量又减少。However, 有一项技术which can prevent the leaks install了,所以,provided this technology is effective,那些害怕是不必要的。问上述的argument based on 哪一个assumption.

GWD原题:

9. GWD28-Q9:

Early in the twentieth century, Lake
                Konfa
became very polluted.  Recently fish populations have recovered as release of industrial pollutants has declined and the lake’s waters have become cleaner.  Fears are now being voiced that the planned construction of an oil pipeline across the lake’s bottom might revive pollution and cause the fish population to decline again.  However, a technology for preventing leaks is being installed.  Therefore, provided this technology is effective, those fears are groundless.

The argument depends on assuming which of the following?

A.      Apart from development related to the pipeline, there will be no new industrial development around the lake that will create renewed pollution in its waters.

B.       Other than the possibility of a leak, there is no realistic pollution threat posed to the lake by the pipeline’s construction.

C.      There is no reason to believe that the leak-preventing technology would be ineffective when installed in the pipeline in Lake
                Konfa
.

D.      Damage to the lake’s fish populations would be the only harm that a leak of oil from the pipeline would cause.

E.       The species of fish that are present in Lake
                Konfa
now are the same as those that were in the lake before it was affected by pollution.

此题答案为B~~~

33#
发表于 2008-12-25 21:12:00 | 只看该作者

MM真是牛啊!恭喜你!

34#
发表于 2008-12-25 21:22:00 | 只看该作者
N. 大学咋就去美国念的啊
35#
发表于 2008-12-25 21:43:00 | 只看该作者

上帝造人MS用了6天,最后一天是周日...


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-12-25 21:44:28编辑过]
36#
发表于 2008-12-25 23:45:00 | 只看该作者

Early in the twentieth century, Lake
                    Konfa
became very polluted.  Recently fish populations have recovered as release of industrial pollutants has declined and the lake’s waters have become cleaner.  Fears are now being voiced that the planned construction of an oil pipeline across the lake’s bottom might revive pollution and cause the fish population to decline again.  However, a technology for preventing leaks is being installed.  Therefore, provided this technology is effective, those fears are groundless.

 

The argument depends on assuming which of the following?

 

  1. Apart from development related to the pipeline, there will be no new industrial development around the lake that will create renewed pollution in its waters.
  2. Other than the possibility of a leak, there is no realistic pollution threat posed to the lake by the pipeline’s construction.
  3. There is no reason to believe that the leak-preventing technology would be ineffective when installed in the pipeline in Lake
                            Konfa
    .
  4. Damage to the lake’s fish populations would be the only harm that a leak of oil from the pipeline would cause.
  5. The species of fish that are present in Lake
                            Konfa
    now are the same as those that were in the lake before it was affected by pollution.

   Answer: B

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-12-25 23:46:03编辑过]
37#
发表于 2008-12-26 00:31:00 | 只看该作者

呵呵,强人呀!

38#
发表于 2008-12-26 11:19:00 | 只看该作者

牛啊....

请问lz是ny那个u的?.....

是在NYC吗?

39#
发表于 2008-12-27 21:07:00 | 只看该作者

恭喜哦~~~


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-12-27 21:08:48编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-29 06:03
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部