|
以下是引用深海的小美人鱼在2004-2-6 4:55:00的发言：
A violin constructed to have improved sound would sound different from the best-sounding existing violins.
To professional violinists, a violin that sounds different from the best-sounding existing violins sounds less like a violin and therefore worse than the best-sounding existing violins.
Professional violinists are the only accepted judges of the sound quality of violins.
Would be the best supported by those statements?
(A) Only amateur violinists should be asked to judge the sound quality of newly constructed violins.
(B) Professional violinists supervise the construction of violins.
(C) The best-sounding existing violins have been in existence fro several centuries.
(D) It is currently impossible to construct a violin that the only accepted judges will evaluate as having improved sound.
(E) It is possible to construct a violin that sounds better than the best-sounding existing violins to everyone but professional violinists.
答案D。死活不明白里面的逻辑是什么。 我对这题也有疑惑，首先问法狠怪“Would be the best supported by those statements?” 其次我觉得也不能退出D啊。 原文说： 1，一把被改造过提高过音色的小提琴，将会和目前存在的best－sounding的琴音色不同。 2，对于唯一的评判员－－小提琴手，来说，只要音色和目前best－sounding不同的琴，就不像一个琴，就不如这个best-sounding的琴。 D说:目前无法造出一把小提琴手认为已经被提高音色的琴。 我觉得无法推出，理由如下： 假设一把琴X，音色等级是50，还有一把最高等级的琴B，音色标准是100. 我改造X琴，将X琴等级提到到80，难道不就是improved？ 虽然他differen with BESTSOUNDING，而且比B琴要差，但是不能因此说他没有提高啊，50－80也是提高啊？ 你结论要说，无法造出一把超越目前best sounding的琴，这我承认，但是你说无法造出一把improved的琴，我难以接受。 | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2008-3-12 03:10:00
