ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 992|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd4-5

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-8-15 22:15:00 | 只看该作者

gwd4-5


    

Q3 to Q6:


    

      Extensive research has shown


    

            that the
effects of short-term price


    

            promotions
on sales are themselves


    

Line     short-term.  Companies’ hopes that


    

  (5)      promotions might have a positive


    

aftereffect have not been borne


    

out for reasons that researchers


    

have been able to identify.  A price


    

promotion entices only a brand’s


    

 (10)     long-term or “loyal” customers;


    

people seldom buy an unfamiliar


    

brand merely because the price is


    

reduced.  They simply avoid paying


    

more than they have to when one of


    

 (15)     their customary brands is temporar-


    

ily available at a reduced
price.  A


    

price promotion does not increase


    

the number of long-term customers


    

of a brand, as it attracts
virtually


    

 (20)     no new customers in the first place.


    

            Nor do
price promotions have linger-


    

            ing
aftereffects for a brand, even


    

negative ones such as damage to


    

a brand’s reputation or erosion of


    

 (25)     customer loyalty, as is often feared.


    

      So why do companies spend so


    

much on price promotions?  Clearly


    

price promotions are generally run


    

at a loss, otherwise there would


    

 (30)     be more of them.  And the bigger


    

the increase in sales at promotion


    

prices, the bigger the loss.  While


    

            short-term
price promotions can


    

have legitimate uses, such as


    

(35)        
reducing excess inventory, it is the


    

recognizable
increase in sales that


    

is their main
attraction to manage-


    

ment, which is therefore reluctant


    

to abandon this strategy despite


    

its effect on the bottom line.


    

------------------f

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    

Q5:


    

The passage suggests that evidence for price promotions’
“effect on the bottom line” (line 40) is provided by


    

 


    
  1. the
         lack of lingering aftereffects from price promotions
  2. the
         frequency with which price promotions occur
  3. price
         promotions’ inability to attract new customers
  4. price
         promotions’ recognizable effect on sales
  5. the
         legitimate uses to which management can put price promotions

    

Answer:


    

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    

  The official answer is c. I think it should be b. Does anyone have any clue?


沙发
发表于 2008-8-23 05:07:00 | 只看该作者

这题我也做错了,回头再看,认为应该选D

题目问“这种最低限度的作用是由什么来提供的”,定位到这句话:it is the recognizable increase in sales that is their main attraction to management. 正是因为短期促销能提供可观的销售增长,经理们才不肯抛弃这个政策。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-3 22:25
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部