LSAT-2-2-15题 (Reasoning Parallelism)

crusaders · 发表于 2004-1-5 16:02:00

15.A well-known sports figure found that combining publicity tours with playing tours led to problems, so she stopped combining the two. She no longer allows bookstore appearances and playing in competition to occur in the same city within the same trip. This week she is traveling to London to play in a major competition, so during her stay in London she will not be making any publicity appearances at any bookstore in London.
Which one of the following most closely parallels the reasoning used in the passage?
(B) The only times that the hospital’s emergency room staff attends to relatively less serious emergencies are times when there is no critical emergency to attend to. On Monday night the emergency room staff attended to a series of fairly minor emergencies, so there must not have been any critical emergencies to take care of at the time.

This ********** Question screwed my fantastic afternoon up!
Could some one help me to figure it out, say, HOW do these two Reasonings parallel together... Thanks a lot ...

多谢大家解答

番茄炒蛋 · 发表于 2004-1-5 17:25:00

共同的逻辑关系

一件事情有两个互相排他的方面，既一个发生则另外一个必不发生
结论里面呢就是一个已经发生了，而另外一个就不会发生了

例如，运动员说了要不就比赛，要不就搞点宣传，然后又说这次他过来是比赛的，所以得出结论他这次过来不会宣传了
你再看看，呵呵，有问题就上来吧，大家都会很热心的

crusaders · 发表于 2004-1-5 19:13:00

谢谢番茄炒蛋兄弟 :]

LSAT-2-2-15题 (Reasoning Parallelism)

LSAT-2-2-15题 (Reasoning Parallelism)

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

浏览过的版块