一道AA没多少思路 大家帮帮忙

Saluda统一高中提过超过200中不同的课程供它的学生选择。路那头一所小的多的私立学校提供80种基本的课程，但是它的毕业生升入大学的比例始终比统一高中要高。去除至少一半的课程而着眼于基本课程，我们可以改善统一高中学生的表现并省下税收。

忽略它因：毕业率低不一定是课程多少造成的

充分性攻击：出去一半的课程不一定就能省下税收

大家帮忙看看还有什么点可以说说

谢谢哈~~~~

错误类比！！false analogy.

或者用all things are equel的模板来写

这两个学校情况不一样不能比

谢谢bigskings

我凑足三个方面啦~~~~~~

还有，

Finally, the author assumes that savings in tax revenues will result from the reduced costs of funding the curriculum. This is not necessarily true. For example, it could turn out that both programs serve the same number of students and require the same number of classrooms and teacher.

这题错误类比是一定要写的！

非常明显！

人都说了另一所私立学校

105. The following appeared in an editorial from a newspaper serving the town of Saluda.

“The Saluda
                    Consolidated
                    High School offers over 200 different courses from which its students can choose. A much smaller private school down the street offers a basic curriculum of only 80 different courses, but it consistently sends a higher proportion of its graduating seniors on to college than Consolidated does. By eliminating at least half of the courses offered there and focusing on a basic curriculum, we could improve student performance at Consolidated and also save many tax dollars.”

还有一个错误是，saulda提供了200门不同的课供选择，但是gap是author并没有提出学生选课的分布率

如果学生选课都集中在80门basic 课程呢

应该把分布率弄出来

节约税收不一定，也许学生选的课都是开课的cost比较低的课呢，这样反而便宜

谢谢pharmacystar

思路很棒啊