What are your valuable answers and explanations?

liynn · 发表于 2003-12-25 13:32:00

1. In a study of the effect of color on producitivity. 50 of 100 factory workders were moved from their drab workroom to a brightly colored workroom. Both these workers and the 50 who remained in the drab workroom increased their productivity, probably as a result of the interest taken by researchers in the work of both groups during the study.

To weaken:
a. The 50 workers moved to the brightly colored room performed precisely the same manufacturing task as the workers who remained in the drab room.
b. The drab workroom was designed to provide adequate space for at most 65 workers.
c. The 50 workers who moved to the brightly colored workroom were matched as closely as possible in age and level of training to the 50 workers who remained in the drab work room
d. nearly all the workers in both groups had volunteered to move to the brightly colored workroom
e. Many of the workers who moved to the brightly colored workroom reported that they liked the drab workroom as well as or better than they liked the brightly colored workroom.

2. The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an organization was circulated to its members for comment.
When more than one nominee is to be named for an office, prospective nominees must consent to nomination and before giving such consent must be told who the other nominees will be.

Which of the following comments concerning the logic of the proposal is accurate if it cannot be known who the actual nominees are until prospective nominees have given their content to be nomineed?

A. the proposal would make it possible for each of several nominees for an office to be aware of who all of the other nominees are.
B. the proposal would widen the choice available to those choosing among the nominees.
C. if there are several prospective nominees, the proposal would deny the last nominees equal treatment with the first.
D. the proposal would enable a prospective nominee to withdraw from competition with a specific person without making that withdrawal known.
E. if there is more than one prospective nominee, the proposal would make it impossible for anyone to become a nominee.

qww · 发表于 2003-12-25 15:13:00

1.答案我认为是B。The drab workroom was designed to provide adequate space for at most 65 workers。淡灰色的工作间设计是最多提供65人工作。
消弱了probably as a result of the interest taken by researchers in the work of both groups during the study的判断。

snow_mountain · 发表于 2003-12-25 15:32:00

2. E?

八戒 · 发表于 2003-12-25 17:11:00

我也觉得第二道题目选E，虽然题目看得不是很明白。
（偷偷查了一下，以前没有做过，的确如此，窃喜...呵....）

我的思路是这样的：
（不知道对不对，因为题目看得不很明白，不知道是不是歪打正着碰到的，希望大家指点呀！感激ing！）

原题目中：
prospective nominees must be told who the other nominees will be ----->prospective nominees must consent to nomination

问题中it cannot be known who the actual nominees
否定了：prospective nominees must be told who the other nominees will be

既是原文推理的逆否命题：
prospective nominees can not consent to nomination---->
prospective nominees can not be told who the other nominees will be

所以我觉得是选E。

讨论.........

snow_mountain · 发表于 2003-12-25 17:19:00

思路差不多。每个人都要先知道其它题名人同意被题名。又说同意后才知道谁被题名了。

八戒 · 发表于 2003-12-25 17:28:00

多谢楼上！

原来我有几个单词没看明白，怪不看得嘻理糊涂的！！

郁闷狂查单词ing！！

qww · 发表于 2003-12-25 17:52:00

我也认为是E。好像题目的问题有一个打印错误。have given their content to be nomineed
应为haven given their consent to be nomineed.
脑袋发木，看了好久才明白。

What are your valuable answers and explanations?

What are your valuable answers and explanations?

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

浏览过的版块