- UID
- 1390765
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2019-3-5
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
Spot the question type: If " answer could be true ", then the argument must be " must be false " or " could be false "
P1: The reviewer argued that the mouse was a new variety of animal --> rules disallow patents for new animal varieties.
C: a patent for genetically engineered mouse developed for laboratory use in studying cancer be decided not to be granted.
So apparently, the core argument here is, If patent allowed, then no new animal variety, and if new animal variety, the no parent allow, if no patent allow, then against granting the patent to which study cancer from labs of genetically engineered mouse .
let us looking into the option
A. If this answer is true, then the argument must be false, since mouse is not domesticated farm animals.
B. Not even in the core.
C. First of all, If A, then B, and now If C, then B. How could you determine whether A and C are 100% related. Secondly, if this is true, then it should be strengthen question.
D. Out of scope => We are discussing animal, not plant.
E. Similar to D ( We are discussing the group of " genetic engineering " but not " conventional breeding "
|
|