ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1263|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教GWD——36

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-10-16 23:28:00 | 只看该作者

请教GWD——36

 In corporate purchasing,

       competitive scrutiny is typically

       limited to suppliers of items that are

Line       directly related to end products.

  (5)      With “indirect” purchases (such as

computers, advertising, and legal

services), which are not directly

related to production, corporations

often favorsupplier partnerships

 (10)       (arrangements in which the

purchaser forgoes the right to

pursue alternative suppliers), which

can inappropriately shelter suppliers

from rigorous competitive scrutiny

 (15)      that might afford the purchaser

economic leverage
        
杠杆作用.  There are two

independent variables—availability

of alternatives and ease of changing

suppliers—that companies should

 (20)      use to evaluate the feasibility of

       subjecting suppliers of indirect

       purchases to competitive scrutiny.

This can create four possible
            

situations.非直接采购以及四种情况

 (25)            In Type 1 situations, there are

many alternatives and change is

relatively easy.  Open pursuit of

alternatives—by frequent com-

petitive bidding, if possible—will

 (30)      likely yield the best results.  In

Type 2 situations, where there

are many alternatives but change

       is difficult—as for providers of

employee health-care benefits—it

 (35)
               is important to continuously test

the market and use the results to

secure concessions from existing

suppliers.  Alternatives provide a

      credible threat to suppliers, even if

 (40)     the ability to switch is constrained.

In Type 3 situations, there ate few

alternatives, but the ability to switch

without difficulty creates a threat that

companies can use to negotiate

 (45)       concessions from existing suppliers.

In Type 4 situations, where there

are few alternatives and change

is difficult, partnerships may be

unavoidable.

GWD-1-Q36:

Which of the following can be inferred about supplier partnerships, as they are described in the passage?

             

  1. They cannot be sustained unless the goods or services provided are available from a large number of suppliers.

  2. They can result in purchasers paying more for goods and services than they would in a competitive-bidding situation.

Which
                
can inappropriately shelter suppliers
                
from rigorous competitive scrutiny
                
that might afford the purchaser
                
economic leverage.

  1. They typically are instituted at the urging of the supplier rather than the purchaser.

  2. They are not feasible when the goods or services provided are directly related to the purchasers’ end products.

  3. They are least appropriate when the purchasers’ ability to change suppliers is limited.

看不懂啊,怎么解释这道题目啊?谢谢大家。

GWD-1-Q36:

Which of the following can be inferred about supplier partnerships, as they are described in the passage?

             

  1. They cannot be sustained unless the goods or services provided are available from a large number of suppliers.

  2. They can result in purchasers paying more for goods and services than they would in a competitive-bidding situation.

Which
        
can inappropriately shelter suppliers
        
from rigorous competitive scrutiny
        
that might afford the purchaser
        
economic leverage.

  1. They typically are instituted at the urging of the supplier rather than the purchaser.

  2. They are not feasible when the goods or services provided are directly related to the purchasers’ end products.

  3. They are least appropriate when the purchasers’ ability to change suppliers is limited.

看不懂啊,怎么解释这道题目啊?谢谢大家。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-12-6 12:14
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部