Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separated an invertebrate animal embryo into two parts at an early stage of its life, it would survive and develop as two normal embryos. This led them to believe that the (5) cells in the early embryo are undetermined in the sense that each cell has the potential to develop in a variety of different ways. Later biologists found that the situation was not so simple. It matters in which plane the embryo is cut. If it is cut in a plane different from the one used (10) by the early investigators, it will not form two whole embryos. A debate arose over what exactly was happening. Which embryo cells are determined, just when do they- become irreversibly committed to their fates, and what (15) are the “morphogenetic determinants” that tell a cell what to become? But the debate could not be resolved because no one was able to ask the crucial questions in a form in which they could be pursued productively. Recent discoveries in molecular biology, however, have (20) opened up prospects for a resolution of the debate. Now investigators think they know at least some of the molecules that act as morphogenetic determinants in early development. They have been able o show that, in a sense, cell determination begins even before an egg (25) is fertilized. Studying sea urchins, biologist Paul Gross found that an unfertilized egg contains substances that func- tion as morphogenetic determinants. They are located in the cytoplasm of the egg cell; i.e., in that part of the (30) cell’s protoplasm that lies outside of the nucleus. In the unfertilized egg, the substances are inactive and are not distributed homogeneously. When the egg is fertilized, the substances become active and, presumably, govern separated an invertebrate animal embryo into two parts at an early stage of its life, it would survive and develop as two normal embryos. This led them to believe that the (5) cells in the early embryo are undetermined in the sense that each cell has the potential to develop in a variety of different ways. Later biologists found that the situation was not so simple. It matters in which plane the embryo is cut. If it is cut in a plane different from the one used (10) by the early investigators, it will not form two whole embryos. A debate arose over what exactly was happening. Which embryo cells are determined, just when do they- become irreversibly committed to their fates, and what (15) are the “morphogenetic determinants” that tell a cell what to become? But the debate could not be resolved because no one was able to ask the crucial questions in a form in which they could be pursued productively. Recent discoveries in molecular biology, however, have (20) opened up prospects for a resolution of the debate. Now investigators think they know at least some of the molecules that act as morphogenetic determinants in early development. They have been able o show that, in a sense, cell determination begins even before an egg (25) is fertilized. Studying sea urchins, biologist Paul Gross found that an unfertilized egg contains substances that func- tion as morphogenetic determinants. They are located in the cytoplasm of the egg cell; i.e., in that part of the (30) cell’s protoplasm that lies outside of the nucleus. In the unfertilized egg, the substances are inactive and are not distributed homogeneously. When the egg is fertilized, the substances become active and, presumably, govern the behavior of the genes they interact with. Since the (35) substances are unevenly distributed in the egg, when the fertilized egg divides, the resulting cells are different from the start and so can be qualitatively different in their own gene activity. The substances that Gross studied are maternal (40) messenger RNA’s --products of certain of the maternal genes. He and other biologists studying a wide variety of organisms have found that these particular RNA’s direct, in large part, the synthesis of histones, a class of proteins that bind to DNA. Once synthesized, the (45) histones move into the cell nucleus, where section of DNA wrap around them to form a structure that resem- bles beads, or knots, on a string. The beads are DNA segments wrapped around the histones; the string is the intervening DNA. And it is the structure of these beaded (50) DNA strings that guides the fate of the cells in which they are located. 25. It can be inferred from the passage that the morphogenetic determinants present in the early embryo are (A) located in the nucleus of the embryo cells (B) evenly distributed unless the embryo is not developing normally (C) inactive until the embryo cells become irreversibly committed to their final function (D) identical to those that were already present in the unfertilized egg (E) present in larger quantities than is necessary for the development of a single individual
E is the best answer.
The second and third paragraphs of the passage indicate that morphogenetic determinants are substances in the embryo that are activated after the egg has been fertilized and that “tell a cell what to become” (lines 21-23). If, as the author asserts in the first paragraph, biologists have succeeded in dividing an embryo into two parts, each of which survives and develops into a normal embryo, it can be concluded that the quantity of morphogenetic determinants in the early embryo is greater than that required for the development of a single individual. 看了前辈们的讨论,OG的解释我明白了,但还有两点想请教大家: 1 C的错误是不是在于m determinant在胚胎早期就已经是active的了,而不是C中所说的inactive? (有点笨,澄清一下,因为前人的帖子好像没明这么说) 2做题的时候,大家怎么保持头脑空白的???我第一遍看完E选项就排除了它,主要是带入了主观认识!脑子里想着,信使RNA这类东东是能复制的,在一个细胞或个体里面就应该正好是够这个细胞或个体用的量(直觉身体里哪种物质超过了必要的量,那就有问题了)然后就在D和C中间犹豫半天,觉得最终的样子和受精不是一回事,另一方面,有根据自己的主观认识,觉得激活了后应该这个东东本身结构什么的应该还是不变的。读了解释和前辈的帖才发现就是对第一段的简单推理!!!   然后就是定位,我根据A、B、C定到了第三段,压根没从E看出来跟第一段有关,请问大家是怎么根据E想到要去找第一段,还想到对第一段进行逻辑推理的? 做完OG11终于看到推断题都回原文找对应,不主观臆测了,但之前对应好像都比较明晰,两个选项都不能轻易找到原文,我想问这时候大家是如何避免用主观认识来判断的?(惭愧的是我做题时都没意识到自己用的是已有的知识,还隐约觉得用的是原文的隐含意思,汗) 还有就是请教大家(特别是做题做得比较多的前辈)GMAT中推断题的正确答案都是有原文对应的,绝不会考到要用常识? 很郁闷很郁闷,请大家帮忙!!!   
[此贴子已经被作者于2007-5-12 20:46:38编辑过] |