请教有什么好方法做LAST纯逻辑题?

fyhllj · 发表于 2003-11-9 13:52:00

(D) describes a dissimilarity without citing any scientific evidence for the existence of that dissimilarity.

正好和题目相反。作者使用了证据。

a correctly prescribed drug depends for its effectiveness only on the drug's composition, whereas the effectiveness of even the most appropriate surgical procedure is transparently related to the skills of the surgeon who uses it.

those are evidences.

The point is that surgical procedures differ in one important respect from medicinal drugs:

dabendan12 · 发表于 2003-11-9 22:38:00

Hey, fyhllj, Does it mean you agree with (D)? But actually the answer key is (A)? Would you please explain more clearly? Thanks a lot!

Alana · 发表于 2003-11-11 12:08:00

我认为 fyhllj 说的对，dissimilarity的evidence其实已经给出了.恰恰是因为给错了evidence，导致制药和手术的dissimilarity比较错误，最终导致the augument is flawed.
so A is right.A反驳的就是evidence的错误。

fyhllj · 发表于 2003-11-12 00:30:00

以下是引用dabendan12在2003-11-9 22:38:00的发言：
Hey, fyhllj, Does it mean you agree with (D)? But actually the answer key is (A)? Would you please explain more clearly? Thanks a lot!

I mean d is wrong. Sorry for the inconvience.

lawyer_1 · 发表于 2004-2-1 21:47:00

1.在不存在A的情况下,可考虑D,但D中的ANY太STRONG,且WITHOUT SCIENTICIC EVIDENCE不合理.原文说的两者的差别本来就是,如何能算WITHOUT SCIENTICIC EVIDENCE.
2.A正确的理由是: 作者只考虑到能拿到手术台上的手术方案,它因为于SKILLS有关而试不出方案优劣.但对那些根本就不行(比以前的治疗措撕都有害,谁敢批准不成熟的方案上手术台)的方案,却不是因为于SKILLS有关而试不出方案好坏,而是其它方法(如理论上行不通或凭经验),作者的反驳犯了以偏槪全的错误.当然这方法和现实生活不太一致

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-2-1 21:53:15编辑过]

weiyu · 发表于 2004-2-25 13:55:00

A说明作者没有考虑到它因的可能性

请教有什么好方法做LAST纯逻辑题?

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

浏览过的版块