|
It is true that it is against international law to sell plutonium to countries that do not yet have nuclear weapons. But if United States companies do not do so, companies in other countries will. 我的理解是：任何有钚的国家卖钚给没有核武器的国家，这种行为是违反国际法律的。但是如果美国的公司不卖的话，其他国家的公司也不会卖的。
我的理解是：任何有钚的国家卖钚给没有核武器的国家，这种行为是违反国际法律的。但是如果美国的公司不卖的话，其他国家的公司也不会卖的。 我的理解是：任何有钚的国家卖钚给没有核武器的国家，这种行为是违反国际法律的。但是如果美国的公司不卖的话，其他国家的公司也不会卖的。 我的理解是：任何有钚的国家卖钚给没有核武器的国家，这种行为是违反国际法律的。但是如果美国的公司不卖的话，其他国家的公司也不会卖的。 Which of the following is most like the argument above in its logical structure? (A) It is true that it is against the police department’s policy to negotiate with kidnappers. But if the police want to prevent loss of life, they must negotiate in some cases. (B) it is true that it is illegal to refuse to register for military service. But there is a long tradition in the United States of conscientious objection to serving in the armed forces. (C) It is true that it is illegal for a government official to participate in a transaction in which there is an apparent conflict of interest. But if the facts are examined carefully, it will clearly be seen that there was no actual conflict of interest in the defendant’s case. (D) It is true that it is against the law to burglarize people’s homes. But someone else certainly would have burglarized that house if the defendant had not done so first. (E) It is true that company policy forbids supervisors to fire employees without two written warnings. But there have been many supervisors who have disobeyed this policy.
OG's explanation:
The argument in the passage acknowledges that a certain action contravenes a law, but it presents an excuse for the action by presupposing that someone will inevitably break this law. Only choice D shares all these features, and is thus the best answer. In Choice A, an excuse is presented for contravening a stated policy. However, unlike in the passage and choice D, there is no presupposition that the policy will inevitably be contravened. Similarly, choices B and E report that illegal activities have occurred, without presupposing that they inevitably will. Choice C describes a case as being one to which the law that is stated is inapplicable
58. Neither a rising standard of living nor balanced trade, by itself, establishes a country’s ability to compete in the international marketplace. Both are required simultaneously since standards of living can rise because of growing trade deficits and trade can be balanced by means of a decline in a country’s standard of living.
If the facts stated in the passage above are true, a proper test of a country’s ability to be competitive is its ability to
(A) balance its trade while its standard of living rises (B) balance its trade while its standard of living falls (C) increase trade deficits while its standard of living rises (D) decrease trade deficits while its standard of living falls (E) keep its standard of living constant while trade deficits rise.
58. The passage states that a country capable of competing in the international marketplace must balance trade while its standard country’s ability to compete in the international marketplace will establish that both of these conditions are met simultaneously. Since neither choice B, nor choice C, nor choice D, nor choice E describes tests that incorporate both of these criteria, these answers are inappropriate.
Choice A, which describes a test that does, is the best answer. ＯＧ的解释我没看明白，哪位ＮＮ帮我解释一下。
[此贴子已经被作者于2006-12-14 11:28:38编辑过] | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2006-12-14 10:45:00
楼主