57. Overused phrases, known as clichés, are rightly criticized because their original distinctive meanings have been so watered down by overuse and misuse that they have lost their precision. Thus, politicians running for office would be more successful at communicating their policies and therefore would be more successful in their efforts to get elected, if they did not use clichés in their speeches. Which of the following, if true, would most undermine the argument’s reasoning? (A) Voters generally choose candidates more on the basis of the candidates’ parties’ policies than on the candidates’ own policies. ❌ 题干的【more successful at communicating their policies】也没说到底是 the candidates’ own policies or the candidates’ parties’ policies (B) It frequently aids candidates’ efforts to get elected if the candidates do not clearly communicate what their policies are. 感觉理解错的,不符合常识 (C) In the course of a political campaign a candidate will often have to give the same speech, or essentially the same speech, many time to many different audiences. (D) Most voters choose which candidate to vote for largely on the voter’s understanding of the candidate’s policies. 我选的 (E) Contrary to the widespread cynicism toward politicians, most candidates are not interested simply in getting elected, but want to get elected on the basis of the policies that they favor. 我们的task是削弱结论【不用cliches,more successful in their efforts to get elected,你candidates更关注什么无所谓】
题型:削弱
————————————————————————
逻辑链
————————————————————————
Premise
Overused phrases, known as clichés, are rightly criticized because their original distinctive meanings have been so watered down by overuse and misuse that they have lost their precision.
Conclusion
Thus, politicians running for office would be more successful at communicating their policies and therefore would be more successful in their efforts to get elected, if they did not use clichés in their speeches.
————————————————————————
OA
It frequently aids candidates’ efforts to get elected if the candidates do not clearly communicate what their policies are
当时为什么没选
没看懂,因为不符合常识
Why OA 常识算个der啊,说了if true,选项说It frequently aids candidates’ efforts to get elected if the candidates do not clearly communicate what their policies are 那么如果候选人讲不清楚他们的policies到底是啥就是一定可以aids candidates’ efforts to get elected! 根据逻辑链 Premise: 用clichés -> their original distinctive meanings lost their precision.
Conclusion: 拒绝cliches -> politicians would be more successful at communicating their policies (their original distinctive meanings WILL NOT lost their precision) and therefore would be more successful in their efforts to get elected. Brief version: cliches -> lose precision 不用cliches -> WILL NOT lost their precision -> more successful at communicating their policies -> more successful in their efforts to get elected. 削弱: 谁跟你说 more successful at communicating their policies -> more successful in their efforts to get elected,作者的结论based on the assumption that more precisely communicate policies, more successful 该OA说:你的assumption是错滴,negate your assumption,your conclusion is 寄 then
OE Most voters choose which candidate to vote for largely on the voter’s understanding of the candidate’s policies.
Why OE is tempting 我错误的将cliche脑补成更详细的阐述candidate’s policies,no, 选项并没有这么说,题干也没有 题干说的是用clichés -> their original distinctive meanings lost their precision ≠ enhance voters understanding 反而是impede understanding了, 我们的任务是削弱结论【if dont use cliche -> more successful】方向反了; OE方向是增强了,more cliche use,less successful; less cliche use, more successful,和结论的方向是一致的,不能削弱
————————————————————————
Takeaway 1. DONT 脑补!
2. 增强削弱选项都是given 一定对的,不要怀疑选项的正确错误,or是否符合常识,他说的一定是对的,our task is to determine whether 这个given true的选项能否削弱这个结论
|