ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1390|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Economist 2005 Ranking

[精华] [复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-9-23 23:48:00 | 只看该作者

Economist 2005 Ranking

Harvard and Wharton refused to participate in all rankings.  But BusinessWeek and U.S.News still include them in their rankings.  The Economist rankings respect their decision not to participate.  So Harvard and Wharton are not ranked in this years Economist's ranking.


1. Northwestern - Kellogg
2. Dartmouth - Tuck
3. Stanford
4. Chicago
5. New York University
6. Michigan - Ross
7. Columbia
8. Berkeley - Hass
9. MIT - Sloan
10. Virginia - Darden
11. UCLA
12. Cornell - Johnson
13. Yale
14. Emory - Goizueta!
15. Duke - Fuqua
16. Carnegie Mellon - Tepper
17. Ohio State - Fisher
18. North Carolina - Kenan-Flagler
19. Washington University - Olin
20. Iowa - Tippie
21. Notre Dame - Mendoza
22. Illinois
23. Southern California - Marshall
24. Penn State - Smeal
25. Georgetown - McDonough
26. Texas - McCombs
27. Maryland - Smith
28. Vanderbilt - Owen
29. Indiana - Kelley
30. Minnesota - Carlson

沙发
发表于 2005-9-23 23:58:00 | 只看该作者
很有帮助的说!
板凳
发表于 2005-9-24 02:53:00 | 只看该作者
MBA students shun league tables, survey shows

Anna Bawden

Thursday September 08 2005

The Guardian



Business school league tables are no longer the main criteria for choosing MBAs, an international survey has revealed.


According to a survey of over 4,000 aspiring MBAs, the most important factor was a school's reputation, followed by the track record of its careers service, return on financial investment, availability of scholarships and other financial aid, and the range of subjects that the school specialised in. But traditional business school rankings came only sixth in order of importance. David Lampe of Harvard Business School said league tables did not take sufficient account of the diversity of student interests. "Students have a wide range of interests, abilities and ambitions and, at the same time, business schools have a wide range of strengths and approaches to business education. What matters most is the match," he explained.


Pat Harker, the dean of Wharton business school at Pennsylvania University, said: "There is a very strong consensus among alumni, faculty and other institutions that the ranking methodologies are severely flawed." As a result, Harvard and Wharton now boycott such league tables.


"There seems to be a growing disillusionment with traditional 'static' rankings both among students and schools", said Nunzio Quacquarelli, director of the World MBA Tour and organiser of the research.


QS, the company behind the World MBA Tour, has followed the Guardian's University rankings and has introduced rankings that can be tailored to reflect individual priorities.


The "scorecard" allows over 200 schools to be weighted according to criteria such as return on investment, strength of faculty and diversity of student body to create a personalised ranking tailored to their own individual needs and abilities.


Participating business schools include all the key European institutions: Italy's SDA Bocconi; France's HEC and Insead; Spain's IESE, ESADE and Instituto de Empresa; Switzerland's IMD and Cambridge, Cranfield, Imperial, London, Manchester and Warwick in the UK. American schools featured include: Chicago, Columbia, Cornell, Dartmouth, Duke, Michigan, Northwestern, UCLA and Wharton. Visitors to the World MBA Tour in London on October 22 at Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre can try the scorecard for free.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-13 18:18
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部