ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1317|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

享受这个长阅读中的obstacle

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2016-12-20 21:01:43 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式

这篇文章中有个点,觉得逻辑很模糊,请指教
  • 文章的第三段末尾说,用比较精确的方式测出的bone也是 1280之后,当用新的技术测试之前研究的骨头的时候,发现也是1280年之后,这就表明之前的研究是有问题的,这其中的推理是因为第二段的研究测试的结果是200 B.C.E,与1280 later 这个结果不相符所以判断之前的study flawed对吧?


Rats caught a free ride to New Zealand when they hopped aboard the boats of early Polynesian explorers. Now, their ancient bones may help pinpoint when humans first set foot on the island. Carbon-dating of bones from the rodents indicates that people reached New Zealand around 1280 or later, rejecting previous research that suggested humans may have landed there more than 1400 years earlier. Although most anthropologists think that humans first arrived in New Zealand around 1250 to 1300, a minority holds that people might have set foot on the island as early as 200 B.C.E. That conclusion is based on 1996 research that carbon-dated bones of rats, which are thought to have been brought to New Zealand by humans either as stowaways or for food. But this study has been controversial because there's no evidence of human settlements at that time. Some critics have suggested that the carbon dates were due to a lab error in preparing the bones. To help clear up the confusion, a team led by Janet Wilmshurst, a paleoecologist at environmental research organization Landcare Research in Lincoln, New Zealand, used a different preparation technique that is thought to be more accurate. The researchers obtained 17 bones from the two excavation sites where the oldest rat remains had been found. Carbon-dating with the improved method indicated that the new bones were from 1280 or later. When the researchers tried the new technique on some of the bones from the previous study, all of them dated to later than 1280, indicating that the earlier research was flawed. The researchers next carbon-dated ancient seeds that the rats had gnawed and that came from one of the excavation sites. The results gave a date of 1290 or later, confirming that humans did not arrive until 1280 at the earliest, the researchers report in the 3 June issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Ian Smith, an anthropologist at the University of Otago in New Zealand, says the finding "provides convincing evidence against the assertion that either rats or people reached New Zealand prior to the 13th century A.D." He adds that the later arrival indicates that humans' devastating impact on New Zealand, which has included deforestation and the extinction of birds and marine mammals, happened in only 600 years, versus more than 2000 years if the initial bone dating had been confirmed. David Lowe, a soil scientist at the University of Waikato in Hamilton, New Zealand, says the findings also indicate that "the destruction caused by the rats in New Zealand has been pronounced and very fast indeed." The rats wiped out several species, including some birds and frogs. Wilmshurst adds that the speed of destruction "makes the risk to currently declining populations of rat-sensitive species more pressing as they could be diminishing faster than previously assumed."

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2016-12-21 10:58:58 | 只看该作者
老的技术:测出200 B.C.E
结果有争议:因为there's no evidence of human settlements at that time. Some critics have suggested that the carbon dates were due to a lab error in preparing the bones.
新的技术:测出1280 or later(证实了上面的争议,之所以测出200BCE是因为a lab error in preparing the bones.)
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2016-12-21 14:34:34 | 只看该作者
ReggieYANG 发表于 2016-12-21 10:58
老的技术:测出200 B.C.E
结果有争议:因为there's no evidence of human settlements at that time. Some  ...

谢谢
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-11 22:40
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部