ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1789|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求讨论GWD-2-GMAT Q14

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2016-9-8 22:44:09 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
GWD-2-GMAT

Q14:
Smithtown University’s fund-raisers succeeded in getting donations from 80 percent of the potential donors they contacted.  This success rate, exceptionally high for university fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job.  On the contrary, since the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base.  The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing effort.

Which of the following, if true, provides more support for the argument?

A.        Smithtown University’s fund-raisers were successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about as frequently as were fund-raisers for other universities in their contacts with such people.
B.        This year the average size of the donations to Smithtown University from new donors when the university’s fund-raisers had contacted was larger than the average size of donations from donors who had given to the university before.
C.        This year most of the donations that came to Smithtown University from people who had previously donated to it were made without the university’s fund-raisers having made any contact with the donors.
D.        The majority of the donations that fund-raisers succeeded in getting for Smithtown University this year were from donors who had never given to the university before.
E.        More than half of the money raised by Smithtown University’s fund-raisers came from donors who had never previously donated to the university.





答案是A

但我觉得C
谢谢大牛

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2016-9-9 14:59:31 | 只看该作者
先看看题干中的重点句子:
good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base.
这句话是说good fund-raisers的标准是他们经常尝试去联系那些less-likely prospects的捐款者以扩大捐赠的基础

而A选项说,Smithtown University’s fund-raisers were successful ( in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about )as frequently as were fund-raisers for other universities in their contacts with such people.

所以就是直接针对这些平时不捐钱的人展开的,在这种人身上,SU的筹款人的成功率和其他学校一样,所以直接用判断标准表示了SU的筹款人是无效的。

而C是典型的迷惑选项。判断标准是那些以前不捐款的人成功率,C只说了经常性捐款人的筹款占之前筹款的大部分,并没有涉及到这些以前不捐款的人,所以不对。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-5 11:43
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部