ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1854|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-II-16

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-8-9 07:45:00 | 只看该作者

大全-II-16

Instead of blaming an airline accident on pilot error, investigators should find out why the error was made by analyzing airplane design, airline management, and pilot-training programs. For only then can changes be made to ensure that the same type of error does not recur and cause another accident.


Which of the following is a presupposition of the argument above?


(A) Pilot error is not a contributing factor in most airline accidents.


(B) Airline companies themselves should be the agents who investigate airline accidents.


(C) Stricter government regulation of airline companies will make air travel significantly safer.


(D) Investigators of airline accidents should contribute to the prevention of future accidents.D


(E) Most pilots who make errors in flying will repeat their errors unless they are retrained


没找到传说中N多高手讨论的帖子,所以提出来再问问。我感觉看了NN们解释似乎有点明白了,但是还有点迷糊,请麻烦再给讲讲。谢谢


沙发
发表于 2005-8-9 09:01:00 | 只看该作者

如果investigators的investigate(也就是find out)没有作用(也就是没有contribute to),那么find out why---都是徒劳的,就不可能有之后(then---)的效果。


所以D就是一个presupposition,而BCE都是无关选项,或者说没有提到。而A中的Pilot error在题目中就不是重点。


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-8-9 9:03:42编辑过]
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-8-9 12:30:00 | 只看该作者
明白了,3Q。
地板
发表于 2005-8-9 14:04:00 | 只看该作者
再问一下:此题中的SHOUD是什么意思?是表推测还是“应该“?
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-8-9 23:20:00 | 只看该作者
是的,我这么理解。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-22 21:48
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部