L10-2-16，请赐教

16. Some people take their moral cues from governmental codes of law; for them, it is inconceivable that something that is legally permissible could be immoral.
Those whose view is described above hold inconsistent beliefs if they also believe that
(A) law does not cover all circumstances in which one person morally wrongs another
(B) a legally impermissible action is never morally excusable
(C) governmental officials sometimes behave illegally
(D) the moral consensus of a society is expressed in its laws
(E) some governmental regulations are so detailed that they are burdensome to the economy
答案A

看了以前的讨论我还是不太理解这里的答案为什么是A，有哪位NN能帮忙解释一下A答案是什么意思吗？尤其是其中的wrongs做何解释？先谢了。

to my understanding, the author's point is basically that if something is legal then it must be moral. Or, if something is immoral, it must be illegal.

option a says, there are immoral circumstances that are not covered by law. Or something immoral but not illegal.

the author cannot accept both views at the same time.

wrongs, i suppose, means in chinese 冤枉，冤屈 and alike.

lawyerme,多谢多谢，不过，one person morally wrongs another 是你所说的someting immoral 吗？对此我还有点绕不过来，别笑话我哦。

To my understanding, the stem means that some people's moral code is law, i.e. besides law, there is nothing that can provide guideline to people's behaviours. In other words, all the standards used to judge whether a behaviour is right or wrong should be derived from law.

Option A says that some behaviour cannot be covered by law. So, this is opposite to the position held by the stem.

原命题：合法－－》Moral

逆否命题：Immoral－－》不合法

但是，如果现实世界中的事情有很多是Immoral的，但是法律没规定（法律没规定就是不存在合不合法的问题），那么就和逆否命题冲突。

我觉得通过“逆否命题和原命题等价”的方法来解这题可能比较好。

我的问题出在没有把A选项的意思读明白，这是我的最大弱点，即英语能力有限，LAST要想做得好，英语能力必须达到一定的水平。最近做LSAT我感觉自己的英语能力还是有所提高了，虽然没能从做题的准确率上直接体现出来。可能是时间太短了吧。

再次多谢大家了！