请教一道逻辑题，实在不理解

ffanghua · 发表于 2003-8-12 13:26:00

Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not harm other as a result of taking the risks .As a result ,they conclude that it should be each person's decision whether or not to wear a seat belt .

which of the following ,if true ,nost seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above ?

A many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat .
B automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need ot pay for the increased injuries of deaths of people not wearing seat belts .
C passagers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings .
D the rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws os greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws
E in autonobile accidents ,a great number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured that are passengers who do wear seat belts .

sunder · 发表于 2003-8-12 14:23:00

题干：do not harm other =〉each person's decision
(b) automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need ot pay for the increased injuries of deaths of people not wearing seat belts .
insurance rates 提高就harm other了，反对论据。

请教一道逻辑题，实在不理解

请教一道逻辑题，实在不理解

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()