斑竹快快来

crystal_z_y · 发表于 2003-8-12 08:54:00

请教两道题目的理解：
1、to hold criminals responsible for their crimes involves a failure to recognize that criminal actions ,like all actions,are ultimately products of the environment that forged the agent"s character.it is not criminals but people in the law-abiding majority who by their actions do most to create and maintain this environment ,therefore ,it is law-abiding people whose actions,and nothing else , make them alone truly responsible for crime.

E. its conclusion contradics an implicit principle on which an earlier part of the argument is based.

为什么答案是E？怎么理解？
谢谢

lewis · 发表于 2003-8-12 09:31:00

conclusion :"it is law-abiding people whose actions,and nothing else , make them alone truly responsible for crime"
contradics
implicit principle :"to hold criminals responsible for their crimes involves a failure to recognize that criminal actions"

cranberry · 发表于 2003-8-12 22:35:00

我的理解是，既然每个人的行为都是环境造成的，那么为什么立法者要承担责任呢？这和环境影响行为的说法矛盾

斑竹快快来

斑竹快快来

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()