LSAT set5 section 1 No. 4

mindfree · 发表于 2003-8-14 13:53:00

greattaste,

You are right in that A-->B. What you misunderstood is the question. B is right. Based on the information from the passage we know that:

strong personalities take over work (C) --> not functional for public use (-A), and
A-->B

Then we can safely follow the logic that C-->(-B)-->(-A)

I think you have got the core of this problem. Just think over the quesiton.

BTW, did you get your ID from the Miller Light Beer?

greattaste · 发表于 2003-8-14 15:01:00

First thank you for your answer.

I finally get the point. I overlooked the sentence "Modern architects, plagued by egoism, have violated this precept. ", which indicate the reason for C --> -A is “not unobtrusive” .

So choice (B) must be right.

From your "BTW", can I follow logically the you lived/are living in the states? As for my ID, it is from Nescafe, not miller light.

以下是引用mindfree在2003-8-14 13:53:00的发言：
greattaste,

You are right in that A-->B. What you misunderstood is the question. B is right. Based on the information from the passage we know that:

strong personalities take over work (C) --> not functional for public use (-A), and
A-->B

Then we can safely follow the logic that C-->(-B)-->(-A)

I think you have got the core of this problem. Just think over the quesiton.

BTW, did you get your ID from the Miller Light Beer?

mindfree · 发表于 2003-8-15 04:27:00

You are right. I was amused by that commercial. I am not a coffee drinker so I missed the Nescafe one.

LSAT set5 section 1 No. 4

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()