ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1563|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全—3 请教一个句子

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-4-11 18:17:00 | 只看该作者

大全—3 请教一个句子

Passage 3 (3/63)


No very satisfactory account of the mechanism that caused the formation of the ocean basins has yet been given. The traditional view supposes that the upper mantle of the earth behaves as a liquid when it is subjected to small forces for long periods and that differences in temperature under oceans and continents are sufficient to produce convection in the mantle of the earth with rising convection currents under the mid-ocean ridges and sinking currents under the continents. Theoretically, this convection would carry the continental plates along as though they were on a conveyor belt (conveyor belt: n. 传送带) and would provide the forces needed to produce the split that occurs along the ridge. This view may be correct: it has the advantage that the currents are driven by temperature differences that themselves depend on the position of the continents. Such a back-coupling, in which the position of the moving plate has an impact on the forces that move it, could produce complicated and varying motions.


On the other hand, the theory is implausible because convection does not normally occur along lines, and it certainly does not occur along lines broken by frequent offsets (an abrupt bend in an object by which one part is turned aside out of line) or changes in direction, as the ridge is. Also it is difficult to see how the theory applies to the plate between the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and the ridge in the Indian Ocean. This plate is growing on both sides, and since there is no intermediate trench, the two ridges must be moving apart. It would be odd if the rising convection currents kept exact pace with them. An alternative theory is that the sinking part of the plate, which is denser than the hotter surrounding mantle, pulls the rest of the plate after it. Again it is difficult to see how this applies to the ridge in the South Atlantic, where neither the African nor the American plate has a sinking part.


Another possibility is that the sinking plate cools the neighboring mantle and produces convection currents that move the plates. This last theory is attractive because it gives some hope of explaining the enclosed seas, such as the Sea of Japan. These seas have a typical oceanic floor, except that the floor is overlaid by several kilometers of sediment. Their floors have probably been sinking for long periods. It seems possible that a sinking current of cooled mantle material on the upper side of the plate might be the cause of such deep basins. The enclosed seas are an important feature of the earth’s surface, and seriously require explanation because, in addition to the enclosed seas that are developing at present behind island arcs, there are a number of older ones of possibly similar origin, such as the Gulf of Mexico, the Black Sea, and perhaps the North Sea.


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-4-11 18:49:20编辑过]
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2005-4-11 18:25:00 | 只看该作者

大全——3 请教一句句子

问题在2段:


On the other hand, the theory is implausible because convection does not normally occur along lines, and it certainly does not occur along lines broken by frequent offsets (an abrupt bend in an object by which one part is turned aside out of line) or changes in direction, as the ridge is.


--------how?


看不清两个句子之间的因果关系。


does not normally occur along lines——certainly does not occur along lines broken by frequent offsets or changes in direction,as the ridge is.


请指教,谢谢!


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-4-11 18:50:02编辑过]
板凳
发表于 2005-4-12 07:54:00 | 只看该作者
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2005-4-12 18:02:00 | 只看该作者

-On the other hand, the theory is implausible because convection does not normally occur along lines, and it certainly does not occur along lines broken by frequent offsets (an abrupt bend in an object by which one part is turned aside out of line) or changes in direction, as the ridge is.
另一方面,老理论有问题,因为对流不是沿线性发生的,并且对流也没有沿着频繁的断裂拐角或方向改变的地方发生。后半句看不太懂了,不懂没关系,正如上面的优点原因一样,缺点原因不必深究,只要知道现实情况与理论的现实应用有矛盾即可。此处隐含的意思是,将老观点应用于现实,应该有“对流沿线性发生”的表现


呵呵,感谢。但发贴前看过了,没找到答案。



along lines——along lines broken by frequent offsets or changes in direction


偶深感此二词组含反义之意味,而非"and certainly"所能引导也~~~~~~


why?


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-4-12 21:13:35编辑过]
5#
发表于 2005-4-13 08:19:00 | 只看该作者
那就请其他人帮着看看吧。我不知道咧。不过我没有感觉出前后的反义啊,我感觉是意思的递进。
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-4-13 22:11:00 | 只看该作者

line我想这里应该是这个意思吧:

3 a : something (as a ridge or seam) that is distinct, elongated, and narrow (m-w)

“ lines broken by frequent offsets or changes in direction”

这还是line吗?

感觉问题在一段,这里的对流到底哪个方向不是线性的?垂直?水平?convection真的有非linear的情况吗?

2 a : the circulatory motion that occurs in a fluid at a nonuniform temperature owing to the variation of its density and the action of gravity  b : the transfer of heat by convection

实在想像不出这个图景~~~~~

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-14 01:07
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部