ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3917|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD4-22答案怎么选a呢?

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-11-13 04:42:00 | 只看该作者

GWD4-22答案怎么选a呢?

      Many managers are influenced by


            dangerous myths about pay that lead


            to counterproductive decisions about


Line     how their companies compensate


  (5)     employees.  One such myth is that


labor rates, the rate per hour paid to


workers, are identical with labor costs,


the money spent on labor in relation to


the productivity of the labor force.


(10)    This myth leads to the assumption that


a company can simply lower its labor


costs by cutting wages.  But labor


costs and labor rates are not in fact


the same:  one company could pay


(15)    its workers considerably more than


another and yet have lower labor


costs if that company’s productivity


were higher due to the talent of its


workforce, the efficiency of its work


(20)    processes, or other factors.  The


            confusion of costs with rates per-


            sists partly because labor rates are


a convenient target for managers who


want to make an impact on their com-


(25)    pany’s budgets.  Because labor rates


are highly visible, managers can easily


compare their company’s rates with


those of competitors.  Furthermore,


labor rates often appear to be a


(30)    company’s most malleable financial


variable:  cutting wages appears an


easier way to control costs than such


            options as reconfiguring work pro-


cesses or altering product design.


(35)         The myth that labor rates and labor


costs are equivalent is supported by


business journalists, who frequently


confound the two.  For example, prom-


inent business journals often remark on


(40)   the “high” cost of German labor, citing


as evidence the average amount paid


to German workers.  The myth is also


perpetuated by the compensation-


consulting industry, which has its own


(45)    incentives to keep such myths alive.


First, although some of these con-


sulting firms have recently broadened


their practices beyond the area of


compensation, their mainstay con-


(50)    tinues to be advising companies on


changing their compensation prac-


tices.  Suggesting that a company’s


performance can be improved in


some other way than by altering its


(55)    pay system may be empirically cor-


rect but contrary to the consultants’


interests.  Furthermore, changes


to the compensation system may


appear to be simpler to implement


(60)    than changes to other aspects of an


organization, so managers are more


likely to find such advice from con-


sultants palatable.  Finally, to the


extant that changes in compensation


(65)    create new problems, the consultants

will continue to have
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2004-11-13 04:43:00 | 只看该作者

Q22:

The author of the passage suggests which of the following about the advice that the consulting firms discussed in the passage customarily give to companies attempting to control costs?

                        

  1. It often fails to bring about the intended changes in companies’ compensation systems.
  2. It has highly influenced views that predominate in prominent business journals.
  3. It tends to result in decreased labor rates but increased labor costs.
  4. It leads to changes in companies’ compensation practices that are less visible than changes to work processes would be.
  5. It might be different if the consulting firms were less narrowly specialized.
板凳
发表于 2004-11-14 12:54:00 | 只看该作者

我认为应该选B; 原文定位如下:


The myth is also



perpetuated by the compensation-



consulting industry, which has its own



(45)      incentives to keep such myths alive.


文章并没有说consulting firms' advices often fail,只是说可能比其它方法更没有效果,即效果不一定很好,而不是fail;



[此贴子已经被作者于2004-11-14 12:54:13编辑过]
地板
发表于 2004-11-16 14:10:00 | 只看该作者

I think E is right.

I think E is the correct answer. The question asked about the "advice".


A: Wrong


The the advice that the consulting firms discussed DOES NOT "often fails to bring about the intended changes in companies’ compensation systems"; Rather, it brings changes to companies' compensation systems although the "changes in compensation create new problems".


B. Wrong


It didn't say in the article that the "advice that the consulting firms discussed in the passage customarily give to companies" "has highly influenced views that predominate in prominent business journals".


I think this choice tries to confuse "prominent business journals" that "often remark on the “high” cost of German labor" with the "advice" the consulting company gives.


C: Wrong


Hard to jump to this conclusion


D: Wrong


The oposite may be true:  It leads to changes in companies’ compensation practices that are MORE visible than changes to work processes would be.


E: Why Do I think it is right?


Read these sentences:


"


First, although some of these con-


sulting firms have recently broadened


their practices beyond the area of


compensation, their mainstay con-


(50)     tinues to be advising companies on


changing their compensation prac-


tices.  Suggesting that a company’s


performance can be improved in


some other way than by altering its


(55)     pay system may be empirically cor-


rect but contrary to the consultants’


interests."


It hints that the company was "narrowly specialized" in "advising companies on changing their compensation practices". So if the consulting company was "less narrowly specialized" in compensation practices, the advice it gives to those companies may be different (might not be focusing on compensation practices).



   



[此贴子已经被作者于2004-11-16 14:15:37编辑过]
5#
发表于 2005-10-2 20:33:00 | 只看该作者

支持A,GWD的答案基本上来源是ETS上的答案

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-24 18:27
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部