- UID
- 554106
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2010-8-8
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
本人一人在国外激战GMAT备考中。。。希望志同道合的朋友一起来互相勉励!! 做新东方网上教材,在阅读板块passage 10 , 发现一个题解释得很牵强,怀疑是错的。麻烦大家看看
选B 还是选E 呢?
Passage 10 Prior to 1975, union efforts to organize public-sector clerical workers, most of whom are women, were some- what limited. The factors favoring unionization drives seem to have been either the presence of large numbers (5) of workers, as in New York City, to make it worth the effort, or the concentration of small numbers in one or two locations, such as a hospital, to make it relatively easy, Receptivity to unionization on the workers, part was also a consideration, but when there were large (10) numbers involved or the clerical workers were the only unorganized group in a jurisdiction, the multioccupa- tional unions would often try to organize them regard- less of the workers’ initial receptivity. The strategic reasoning was based, first, on the concern that politi- (15) cians and administrators might play off unionized against nonunionized workers, and, second, on the conviction that a fully unionized public work force meant power, both at the bargaining table and in the legislature. In localities where clerical workers were few (20) in number, were scattered in several workplaces, and expressed no interest in being organized, unions more often than not ignored them in the pre-1975 period. But since the mid-1970’s, a different strategy has emerged. In 1977, 34 percent of government clerical (25) workers were represented by a labor organization, compared with 46 percent of government professionals, 44 percent of government blue-collar workers, and 41 percent of government service workers, Since then, however, the biggest increases in public-sector unioniza- (30) tion have been among clerical workers. Between 1977 and 1980, the number of unionized government workers in blue-collar and service occupations increased only about 1.5 percent, while in the white-collar occupations the increase was 20 percent and among clerical workers (35) in particular, the increase was 22 percent. What accounts for this upsurge in unionization among clerical workers? First, more women have entered the work force in the past few years, and more of them plan to remain working until retirement age. Conse- (40) quently, they are probably more concerned than their predecessors were about job security and economic bene- fits. Also, the women’s movement has succeeded in legit- imizing the economic and political activism of women on their own behalf, thereby producing a more positive atti- (45) tude toward unions. The absence of any comparable increase in unionization among private-sector clerical workers, however, identifies the primary catalyst-the structural change in the multioccupational public-sector unions themselves. Over the past twenty years, the occu- (50) pational distribution in these unions has been steadily shifting from predominantly blue-collar to predomi- nantly white-collar. Because there are far more women in white-collar jobs, an increase in the proportion of female members has accompanied the occupational shift (55) and has altered union policy-making in favor of orga- nizing women and addressing women’s issues.
46. According to the passage, in the period prior to 1975, each of the following considerations helped determine whether a union would attempt to organize a certain group of clerical workers EXCEPT (A) the number of clerical workers in that group (B) the number of women among the clerical workers in that group (C) whether the clerical workers in that area were concentrated in one workplace or scattered over several workplaces (D) the degree to which the clerical workers in that group were interested in unionization (E) whether all the other workers in the same jurisdiction as that group of clerical workers were unionized |
|