ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1212|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]gwd7-12

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-4-5 20:43:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]gwd7-12

看过讨论了,大家都在正BD,我想问一下C.那个题目我不太明白,说不同后面接哪个人的观点啊?

  Linda Kerber argued in the mid-

       1980’s that after the American Revolution

       (1775-1783), an ideology of “republican

Line       motherhood” resulted in a surge of edu-

  (5)      cational opportunities for women in the

United States.  Kerber maintained that

the leaders of the new nation wanted

women to be educated in order to raise

politically virtuous sons.  A virtuous citi-

 (10)      zenry was considered essential to the

success of the country’s republican form

of government; virtue was to be instilled

not only by churches and schools, but

by families, where the mother’s role

 (15)      was crucial.  Thus, according to Kerber,

motherhood became pivotal to the fate

of the republic, providing justification for

an unprecedented attention to female

education.

 (20)            Introduction of the republican moth-

       erhood thesis dramatically changed

       historiography.  Prior to Kerber’s work,

educational historians barely mentioned

women and girls; Thomas Woody’s 1929

 (25)      work is the notable exception.  Examining

newspaper advertisements for acade-

mies, Woody found that educational

opportunities increased for both girls

and boys around 1750.  Pointing to “An

 (30)      Essay on Woman” (1753) as reflecting

a shift in view, Woody also claimed that

practical education for females had

       many advocates before the Revolution.

Woody’s evidence challenges the notion

 (35)
        that the Revolution changed attitudes

regarding female education, although it

may have accelerated earlier trends.

Historians’ reliance on Kerber’s “repub-

      lican motherhood” thesis may have

 (40)     obscured the presence of these trends,

making it difficult to determine to what

extent the Revolution really changed

women’s lives.

Q12:

The passage suggests that, with regard to the history of women’s education in the United States, Kerber’s work differs from Woody’s primarily concerning which of the following?

             

  1. The extent to which women were interested in pursuing educational opportunities in the eighteenth century

  2. The extent of the support for educational opportunities for girls prior to the American Revolution

  3. The extent of public resistance to educational opportunities for women after the American Revolution

  4. Whether attitudes toward women’s educational opportunities changed during the eighteenth century

  5. Whether women needed to be educated in order to contribute to the success of a republican form of government


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-4-5 20:44:14编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2007-4-11 19:14:00 | 只看该作者

个人认为是要选出K的观点

C说The extent of public resistance to educational opportunities for women after the American Revolution

resistance不太对吧。

你可以去http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=25&replyID=533918&id=61240&skin=0看一下大家的讨论情况。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-8 03:39
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部