我是10月29号早场。从9月初复习以来到现在,几乎每天都保证14个小时以上的复习时间(主攻阅读和语法)。1.自己的数学很差,但是总是想凭借运气去撞机经,所以复习的很少。。。这次考试败在M上面了。。。做的我只想哭。机经一共才出现了3道。。。我的数学成绩就是大家说的“外国人”那一类了。在此,我想告诉大家,也提醒我自己:机经只能起到辅助的作用,不能完全依赖!!!在GMAT面前,实力才是上上策!V部分语法尤其重要,一定要多多总结。2.在考前我一直用XDF的黄皮教材复习的(语法是白勇的《语法全解》,阅读是杨继的那本),做起来一直正确率很高。现在想来是因为上面很多题目都出自OG,所以相对简单的多。我建议大家在复习时候不能完全只做这些书。考前来不及做GWD了,只糊里糊涂做了两套,PREP也是马马虎虎做了几遍(600,650),就直接冲上战场了。后来看到很多NN把GWD都做烂了的,才晓得自己当初的做法是多么愚蠢,感觉像丢了西瓜捡芝麻一样。3.数学在复习的时候,遇到不懂的,一定要弄熟。很多题,比如余数问题等,都是有套路的。数学千万要弄明白,或者问身边的高人,或者上CD找。如果能弄清楚个体面的分数。 大概教训就总结这么多了,也提醒各位童鞋留心注意一下吧。考完试走出考场,虽然天上是艳阳高照,可是我觉得天都塌下来一样。。。昨天,我走在秋日的午后,在街头,迷失了我自己。。。 惨案到此吧。不打击大家了。都怪我自己不够认真吧。准备明年元月再战。可是现在一点情绪都没得。 机经记了一些,提供如下: AA: 很经典的题目,范文224中10题: "The past winter,200 students from Waymarsh State University traveled to the state capitol building to protest against proposed cuts in funding for various state college programes.The other12,000 Waymarsh students evidently weren't so concerned about their education:They either stayed on campus or left for winter break.Since the group who did not protest is far more numerous,it is more representative of the state's college students than are the protests.Therefore the state legislature need not need the appeals of the protesting students." “ 去年冬天,Warmarch州立大学有200个学生前往州议会大楼,抗议削减州立大学项目经费的提案。另外12000名学生显然对自己的教育漠不关心,他们要么待在校园里,要么出去过寒假了。由于未参加抗议者远多于抗议者,他们更能代表本州大学生的想法。因此,州立法机构无需理睬抗议学生的呼吁。” AI: " The most effecitve way for the businessperson to maximize profits in a long period is to keep high standards of ethics." 数学:不知怎么,这次数学没有多少是机经里的。可能自己前10题做得太差,一直徘徊在低分题库的原因吧。。。 啊。。。哎。。想了半天。。。记不得了。。。对不起大家啊。。。机经里有考到的:67题,14题。。。其他的基本没有遇到。都怪我做数学时候情绪不佳,很多题都是乱点的。对不起大家哦! 语文:语文这次成绩倒是还蛮理想的。看来果真是哪里下功夫哪里成就高啊。pace掌握的很好,最后做完时还剩将近10分钟。 阅读部分:1。德国失业率问题,机经里有且很详尽;2.美国妇女运动。长,但是结构清晰,不难。后面的题目也很简单; 语法部分:这次考试的语法题比较多,还好自己的语法比较扎实。考到了not only,but also;考到了require从句中使用动词原形表虚拟语气;考到了主从句一致的问题。(分词在句首,考得主句的主语问题);还有一个题,也是机经里出现的,只有几个词:could,were able to to...选were able to do...比较确定,因为之后出现了几个全划线的句子。 逻辑:机经里面有提到,吸二手烟的问题,我直接到选项里面去找second-hand smoking了;还有一道是原题。 好像机经里也有。 In the late 1980’s, the population of sea otters in the North Pacific Ocean began to decline. Of the two plausible explanations for the decline—increased predation by killer whales or disease—disease is the more likely. After all, a concurrent sharp decline in the populations of seals and sea lions was almost certainly caused by a pollution-related disease, which could have spread to sea otters, whereas the population of killer whales did not change noticeably. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the reasoning? - Killer whales in the North Pacific usually prey on seals and sea lions but will, when this food source is scarce, seek out other prey.
- There is no indication that substantial numbers of sea otters migrated to other locations from the North Pacific in the 1980’s.
- Along the Pacific coast of North America in the 1980’s, sea otters were absent from many locations where they had been relatively common in former times.
- Following the decline in the population of the sea otters, there was an increase in the population of sea urchins, which are sea otters’ main food source.
- The North Pacific populations of seals and sea lions cover a wider geographic area than does the population of sea otters.
另外还有一个题,是讲一种动物身体里面有zonic这种元素什么的。。。抓耳。。。实在想不起来了。。。以前看机经的时候不觉得,怎么自己回忆起来就这么有难度啊!!太佩服前辈了!只能模模糊糊记得这么多了,大家凑合着看吧。祝兄弟姐妹们好运哦!!!
[此贴子已经被作者于2009/10/30 10:01:39编辑过] |