ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1675|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

北美10号回报机经 710

[精华] [复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-4-11 16:32:00 | 只看该作者

北美10号回报机经 710

下午考完的时候,脑子一片空白,但是觉得得到大家这么多的帮助,怎么也要回报大家。现在晚上渐渐想起一些了.先说机经:

数学:非常感谢Hippo4的整理,其中几经的很多,大家好好看看JJ,掌握重要知识点就不害怕变形了

JJ没有的
1. |2x+3|>0是否正确? 有一条件是 X不等于负3/2,就是这个

2.

    
        
                
                
                
                
            
            
                
                
                
                
            
            
                
                
                
                
            
            
                
                
                
                
            
        

                    

 


                

                    

正面


                

                    

反面


                

                    

total


                

                    

Black


                

                    

12


                

                    

X


                

                    

X


                

                    

Red


                

                    

28


                

                    

X


                

                    

X


                

                    

total


                

                    

30


                

                    

X


                

                    

50


                

一个图标,X的表示数值,想不起来了,也不重要。题目说一个团队要在t恤上做logo,有人说要黑色在正面,有人说在方面,人数如图。问among
the people 同意在正面的,black有?%。很简单 12/30。但是要看仔细题目among 的范围,我开始差点算成total的。

3.一个10c边长的正方形铁皮,卷成圈柱,问体积?
 很简单,根据10周长求半径,然后底面积*高

verbal:

阅读都是jj的,
1.中国的chan,很长但是简单,找找文中定文;
2. 鸟儿的wing;
3. wind推动地球改变时间,
4. 还有发展中国家manufacturing 和severce section关系的,说了原因等等。有一道题问发达国家政府怎么怎么的,我选了他们忽视了保持manufacturing投资的那个选项,文中有定位,在说了发展中国家投资severce section的同时对manufacturing也有很大投资的后面。

逻辑遇到很多完成句子的题,我最头痛的。

语法确实和prep有些不一样,但是我觉得把prep研究了,是很有帮助挑战难题的。

好了,好困哦,明天再接着想给大家!good luck to everybody!

昨天没有说作文,都是jj里的, 感谢kennyin的整理
AA200学生去protest against cutting funds, 12000没有去的那道
AI all the group should use sharing responsibilities and duties. central authority can not get work done的那道

语法 点有一个主谓一至, 有一个not by... but by..., by.... and by
语法虽然和prep有些不一样,没有见过。不过个人觉得做好了prep和og对于题目分析很有用处,思路会清楚和正确。


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-4-11 23:40:49编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2008-4-11 16:36:00 | 只看该作者

沙发,谢谢MM的分享...

恭喜哦...

板凳
发表于 2008-4-11 17:19:00 | 只看该作者


            

恭喜哦!!!   

 

想请教牛牛几个问题:

研究鸟类的尾巴动作 通常认为不同的动作具有特定的意义 但是鸟在驱赶飞虫的时候也会摆动尾巴 用某种白鸟举例 ,有一种解释是说是为了alert那些predator,但是又用事实推翻了,最后一种解释说,是为了ambush,说predator在攻击之前,会仔细观察,然后挑一个弱白鸟来攻击,后面说这种动作是一个cue,(这里记不清了)
Q1:主旨:
A.support a hyph that tail wagging has some advantag of some specific species of birds.
B.提供support说明 tail wagging is crucial to the bird's survial.
我就在这两个之间犹豫了,最后选的后者
(请问牛牛我去翻了一下原文,觉得摇尾巴的确是他们生存的关键,因为摇尾巴可以趋赶敌人,请牛牛确认一下,是不是B)
Q2:同意以下哪个观点?选项都是关于鸟什么时候摆尾巴的,有~%……—¥*
忘记了,因为我可能选错了就不乱说了 (这个牛牛记得吗?)
Q3:Weaken the claim that the prefdator ambush 是为了什么什么的
总之文章考点在这个ambush部分,由于看得快或者可能没完全看懂,所以我估计我的答案不太对,但我只记得我最后斟酌时的几个选项了,大家到时好好看就是了,不长。
(基本上这题我题目也看不懂,望牛牛回想一下)

Furthermore, wagging was not restricted to situations in which the wagtail had seen a predator and needed to inform it that it had been seen or that the bird was vigilant or able to escape because it occurred almost continuously during preening and feeding. In addition, during the videotaping no approach of a raptor(猛兽类) was recorded. As wagging does not seem to be restricted to direct encounters between wagtails and predators, it may be directed to predators that ambush their prey. Predators may make absolute judgements about the level of vigilance in a group of prey or compare vigilance levels between individuals, and then approach and attack the less vigilant prey. However, opportunistic predators such as sparrowhawks(雀鹰) do not prefer to attack nonvigilant rather than vigilant prey. Cresswell et al. (2003) suggested that if predators show preferences, they might do so on the basis of cues more complex than posture alone. Wagging could be such a cue and might be a better long-distance signal than body posture to a possible predator. To investigate this possibility, it would be worth widening the choice experiments presented by Go¨tmark & Unger (1994) and Cresswell et al. (2003)
[转贴]

地板
发表于 2008-4-11 17:20:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用kenzopeace在2008-4-11 17:19:00的发言:


   

恭喜哦!!!   

 

想请教牛牛几个问题:

研究鸟类的尾巴动作 通常认为不同的动作具有特定的意义 但是鸟在驱赶飞虫的时候也会摆动尾巴 用某种白鸟举例 ,有一种解释是说是为了alert那些predator,但是又用事实推翻了,最后一种解释说,是为了ambush,说predator在攻击之前,会仔细观察,然后挑一个弱白鸟来攻击,后面说这种动作是一个cue,(这里记不清了)
Q1:主旨:
A.support a hyph that tail wagging has some advantag of some specific species of birds.
B.提供support说明 tail wagging is crucial to the bird's survial.
我就在这两个之间犹豫了,最后选的后者
(请问牛牛我去翻了一下原文,觉得摇尾巴的确是他们生存的关键,因为摇尾巴可以趋赶敌人,请牛牛确认一下,是不是B)
Q2:同意以下哪个观点?选项都是关于鸟什么时候摆尾巴的,有~%……—¥*
忘记了,因为我可能选错了就不乱说了 (这个牛牛记得吗?)
Q3:Weaken the claim that the prefdator ambush 是为了什么什么的
总之文章考点在这个ambush部分,由于看得快或者可能没完全看懂,所以我估计我的答案不太对,但我只记得我最后斟酌时的几个选项了,大家到时好好看就是了,不长。
(基本上这题我题目也看不懂,望牛牛回想一下)

Furthermore, wagging was not restricted to situations in which the wagtail had seen a predator and needed to inform it that it had been seen or that the bird was vigilant or able to escape because it occurred almost continuously during preening and feeding. In addition, during the videotaping no approach of a raptor(猛兽类) was recorded. As wagging does not seem to be restricted to direct encounters between wagtails and predators, it may be directed to predators that ambush their prey. Predators may make absolute judgements about the level of vigilance in a group of prey or compare vigilance levels between individuals, and then approach and attack the less vigilant prey. However, opportunistic predators such as sparrowhawks(雀鹰) do not prefer to attack nonvigilant rather than vigilant prey. Cresswell et al. (2003) suggested that if predators show preferences, they might do so on the basis of cues more complex than posture alone. Wagging could be such a cue and might be a better long-distance signal than body posture to a possible predator. To investigate this possibility, it would be worth widening the choice experiments presented by Go¨tmark & Unger (1994) and Cresswell et al. (2003)
[转贴]

同問!!!

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-4-11 23:17:00 | 只看该作者
Q1:主旨:
A.support a hyph that tail wagging has some advantag of some specific species of birds.
B.提供support说明 tail wagging is crucial to the bird's survial.
我就在这两个之间犹豫了,最后选的后者
(请问牛牛我去翻了一下原文,觉得摇尾巴的确是他们生存的关键,因为摇尾巴可以趋赶敌人,请牛牛确认一下,是不是B)这道题我不确定A还是B,我觉得好像自己这两个都没有选,有个更好条件的,但是怎么也想不起来了。不好意思
Q2:同意以下哪个观点?选项都是关于鸟什么时候摆尾巴的,有~%……—¥*
忘记了,因为我可能选错了就不乱说了 (这个牛牛记得吗?)这道题我选了有
这道题我好像选了有单词preening的那个选项,在原文中可以找到定位,句子有明显转折的意思。
Q3:Weaken the claim that the prefdator ambush 是为了什么什么的
总之文章考点在这个ambush部分,由于看得快或者可能没完全看懂,所以我估计我的答案不太对,但我只记得我最后斟酌时的几个选项了,大家到时好好看就是了,不长。
(基本上这题我题目也看不懂,望牛牛回想一下)这道题记得清楚了,问的是那一种条件如果是真的最Weaken鸟类的这个动作是用来防捕食者的,选项是选当鸟类看到捕食者后摇尾巴的动作频率反而慢下来了。
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-4-11 23:27:00 | 只看该作者
祝大家好运
[此贴子已经被作者于2008-4-11 23:28:26编辑过]
7#
发表于 2008-4-12 01:01:00 | 只看该作者
恭喜lzmm,下周六我就要上考场了,心里怕怕
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-6 12:36
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部