ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Vorland's government is planning a nationwide ban on smoking in restaurants. The objection that the ban would reduce restaurants' revenues is ill founded. Several towns in Vorland enacted restaurant smoking restrictions five years ago. Since then, the amount the government collects in restaurant meal taxes in those towns has increased 34 percent, on average, but only 26 percent elsewhere in Vorland. The amount collected in restaurant meal taxes closely reflects restaurants' revenues.

Which of the following, if true, most undermines the defense of the government's plan?

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4714

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 9526|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd-13-5

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-8-3 16:25:00 | 显示全部楼层

什么叫“most undermines the defense of the government’s plan”?

如果原文讲The objection that the ban would reduce restaurants’ revenues is ill founded. 又说government’s plan使该地区的收入增加比其他地方快,那E的选项说government revenues from sales taxes have grown no faster in the towns with restaurant smoking restrictions than in the towns that have no such restrictions是不是相当于否定both objection and government’s plan?

怎么理解这些关系呀?

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-18 14:48
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部