不好意思现在才有空过来。。。
顺带问一下我同时也负责改你的独立吗?忙得各种晕结果忘了把分组截图
The professor in the lecture disputes the reading passage and argue that the painting of the elderly woman is definitely a work of Remdandt, proved by some examiniation by some scientists. In the lecture, several reason is cited to explain those doubts, even though the professor admites the evidence pointed out in the passage.(这里的第一段总结得好精炼!)
The first reason is that inconsistencies between the elderly woman's linen cap and the fur collar in the painting is caused by someone after the painting was finished for hundreds years. The professor indicates that a X-ray examination of this painting reveals that some color was added to the original painting after 100 year the painting finished, on the purpose to increase its value. The X-ray examination shows that the original painting is well consisited in the detail of the dress which is expected to be the work of R(这里不太确定是否可以直接用一个字母来代替人名。不过既然已经听出来了,多打几个字也没什么吧?).
Moreover, as for the light and shadow, the professor points out that the face in the painting will reappear to be illuminated by an original light color in the fur collar, which has been changed by later painter. So in the original painting, the light and shadow is well managed as it is supposed to be a R' work.(这里只说出了教授的反驳,建议还是提及一下文段中说的具体存在的问题。)
Finally, the evidence of glued panel is also affected by later painter. As the professor argues, the original painting is definitely painted in a single panel, but someone added these pieces of wood on the top side of the original panel to enlarge the painting board to make it more valuable and grand. Additionally, the professor also gives another evidence to prove this work's being painted by R. Some studies have found that the wood of the original panel is from the same tree which was also used to made the panel for R's another works -- his self portrait. (这一段听力部分的细节和点都很到位,但是文段的存在感还是稍弱)
总体印象:大概是因为楼主有过精听,对比起初稿,这一篇的听力部分的点全部都很到位。但是阅读部分却因此而忽略了,建议还是提及一下。
最后附上TIPs和来自无老师的满分范文
TIP:
这篇文章在成文的过程中不可避免的要对passage 部分进行一定的转述,仅仅写TS 是不够的。这是因为这些要转述的细节是lecture 反驳的基础,如果回避了,就无法逻辑清晰了,因为会给读者天外飞仙之感。在成文的过程中,lecture 部分的细节是重中之重,一定要把那些回答why 的内容体现出来。这就是为什么要求精听了。听了个大概,然后开始猜细节,这样的结果只有一种,那就是死的很惨。所以,不要随便说自己听懂了,如果试着一句句的听写出来,或者仔细看看lecture 部分的文本,是很容易发现自己漏掉了一些好像很小但是却很重要的部分。
范文:
The lecture revises the idea presented in the text, that Rembrandt was not the artist who painted the famous painting "Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet”. The inconsistency between the white cap, which identifies the woman as a servant, and the expensive fur collar she wears dissolves as the Professor explains that the fur collar was apparently painted over the original painting to increase its worth by displaying an aristocratic woman. In addition, the assumption that light and shadow in the painting do not fit together is refuted by the fact that in the original painting, the woman wears a light cloth that illuminated her face. Thus the presentation of light and shadow was indeed very realistic and accurate, as it is characteristic of Rembrandt’s paintings. Finally, the mystery of the panel consisting of patches glued together is also solved in the lecture. Actually, the wood panel was later enlarged to make it more grand and valuable, but the original painting was painted on a single panel, as Rembrandt would have done it. Furthermore, the wood is of the same tree used in other Rembrandt paintings, like the "Self-Portrait with a Hat”. All this information points to Rembrandt as the painter of the controversial painting. |