ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

The OLEX Petroleum Company has recently determined that it could cut its refining costs by closing its Grenville refinery and consolidating all refining at its Tasberg refinery. Closing the Grenville refinery, however, would mean the immediate loss of about 1,200 jobs in the Grenville area. Eventually the lives of more than 10,000 people would be seriously disrupted. Therefore, OLEX's decision, announced yesterday, to keep Grenville open shows that at OLEX social concerns sometimes outweigh the desire for higher profits.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument given?

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4716

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 9147|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

天山-4-21

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-2-9 17:01:00 | 显示全部楼层

OLEX social concerns sometimes outweigh the desire
for higher profits.
这是文章的结论


削弱只是削弱结论,和其他没有关系。


答案里一定要有这样的意思,OLEX这么做其实还是因为钱的关系。


应该是E吧,看到enormous cost就知道是答案了。


B 不能consolidate不意味着要关闭。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-5 19:46
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部