A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of immune-system activity tend to score much lower on tests of mental health than do people with normal or high immune-system activity.The researcher concluded from this experiment that the immune system protects against mental illness as well as against physical disease.
The researcher's conclusion depends on which of the following assumptions?
This is a typical puzzle of correlation and causation. If event A and event B happend together, there are several possible scenarios: A causes B; B causes A; a third event C causes both A and B.
In the question your posted, it is a necessary assumtion. If you use negation method on answer D, you will get: Mental illness DOES cause people's immune-system activity to decrease. If that is the case, then the conclusion that the immune system protects against mental illness does not hold. Hence, answer D is required for the original conclusion.
楼上讲的很清晰,但我不明白为什么,Mental illness DOES cause people's immune-system activity to decrease,会weaken the conclusion that the immune system protects against mental illness
-- by 会员 zhijingya (2011/2/22 22:43:57)
Simple.
If mental illness causes people's immune-system activity to decrease,then the conclusion that the immune system protects against mental illness is wrong, isn't it?