ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

"Life expectancy" is the average age at death of the entire live-born population. In the middle of the nineteenth century, life expectancy in North America was 40 years, whereas now it is nearly 80 years. Thus, in those days, people must have been considered old at an age that we now consider the prime of life.

Which of the following, if true, undermines the argument above?

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 11123|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GMAT 逻辑分析题 (8)

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-11-16 11:00:08 | 显示全部楼层 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
If there is any fierce competition in the Asian Games in Guangzhou, the attending audience will be treated to a mesmerizing and memorable moment. But there will not be a mesmerizing and memorable moment unless there are diehard sports fans in the audience. To be a diehard sports fan, one must understand the spirit of sports.

If all the statements above are true, which one of the following statements must also be true?

A) If there are no diehard sports fans in the audience, then there will be no fierce competition in the Asian Games in Guangzhou.

B) No people who understand the spirit of sports will be in the audience if the audience will not be treated to a mesmerizing and memorable moment.

C) If there will be people in the audience who understand the spirit of sports, then at least one competition in the Asian Games in Guangzhou will be fierce.

D) The audience will be treated to a mesmerizing and memorable moment unless there are people in the audience who do not understand the spirit of sports.

E) If there are diehard sports fans in the audience, then there will be fierce competition in the Asian Games in Guangzhou.
收藏收藏1 收藏收藏1
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2010-11-16 12:29:33 | 显示全部楼层
Yes, we got a winner!
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-7-2 09:29:21 | 显示全部楼层
This is a formal logic problem. In formal logic, recognition of trigger is very important. Trigger is the sufficient condition in an If ..., then ... statement.

From the stimulus:
But there will not be a mesmerizing and memorable moment unless there are diehard sports fans in the audience.
Or in If/then form:
If there are NOT diehard sports fans in the audience, then there will not be a mesmerizing and memorable moment.

There is not statement in the stimulus with "diehard sports fans" as the trigger (sufficient condition). Therefore, E) is wrong.
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2011-7-3 11:02:08 | 显示全部楼层
could anyone pls explain why C is not right?
-- by 会员 alex168 (2011/7/3 3:57:58)



The reason is the same: no trigger for C).

The last sentence in the stimulus:
To be a diehard sports fan, one must understand the spirit of sports.
Or: If one is a diehard sports fan, then one understands the spirit of sports.
Note: "one understands the spirit of sports" is not a sufficient condition (trigger).
C) If there will be people in the audience who understand the spirit of sports, then at least one competition in the Asian Games in Guangzhou will be fierce.

C) needs "one understands the spirit of sports" to be a trigger. However, no trigger can be found in the stimulus.
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-8-5 20:48:13 | 显示全部楼层
If there is any fierce competition in the Asian Games in Guangzhou, the attending audience will be treated to a mesmerizing and memorable moment. But there will not be a mesmerizing and memorable moment unless there are diehard sports fans in the audience. To be a diehard sports fan, one must understand the spirit of sports.

Fierce competition --> m&m moment
m&m moment --> diehard fans
diehard fans --> understand the spirit of sports.

Inference:
1) Fierce competition --> diehard fans
2) Fierce competition --> understand spirit of sports
3) m&m moment --> understand the spirit of sports
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-8-9 22:04:06 | 显示全部楼层
Fierce competition --> m&m moment
m&m moment --> diehard fans

If you acknowledge the above premises, then their contrapositives are correct:
No diehard fans --> No m&m moment
No m&m moment --> No fierce competition

Therefore, No diehard fans --> No fierce competition

For formal logic questions in CR, do not add your own objective/subjective opinions to the logic chains in the passage. Remember, we are analyzing the author's logic reasonings here, not yours. ONLY focus on the logic statements in the passage and go from there.
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-8-10 02:35:13 | 显示全部楼层
Thks NN for the explanations.

My summary from this question:
1. A unless B: A ->B (after UNLESS is a necessary condition)
2. To / in order to represents the if-part in if-then statements.
-- by 会员 AlohaDJ (2011/8/10 1:37:05)



A unless B:   Not A --> B (You have to negate the claim in A to make it a sufficient condition).

Not A unless B: A --> B
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-8-20 10:27:47 | 显示全部楼层
sdcar, I have a question about the trigger. Is it something that appears in the stimulus? I saw you say sufficient conditon, so I think the trigger must appear as it does in the stimulus, am I right?
-- by 会员 corrine90 (2011/8/20 9:52:35)



That's right. The trigger is the sufficient condition in a logic statement. Because without the trigger, you won't logically reach the necessary condition.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-6-8 15:07
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部