ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3933|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

有题想不通,请大牛指教

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-10-29 16:12:00 | 显示全部楼层
I have the same doubt about the explanation of OG!
Could someone give us a hand?Thanks advance.


But I agree that E is correct answer.
The argument tell us that "it takes several pounds of grain to produce one pound of meat".If people in gortland who increase their consumption of meat will radically decrease their consumption of grain,the amout of meat will increase.If so , even though per capita consumption of meat has also risen toward the world
average,the increase in the production of meat may satisfy the need of gortland.
Consequently, the conclusion that gortland will soon have to import either grain or meat or both will be seriously undermined.
No doubt , the contradictory of E will weaken the argument.
So , E is an assumption!

Welcome to dispute my view.

沙发
发表于 2003-10-30 10:59:00 | 显示全部楼层
以下是引用kathy72在2003-10-29 21:59:00的发言:
202. B 的意思是说该国的人口数量保持稳定. 将其取非, 假设该国人口增加, 那么该国的粮食更不够吃了, 更应该从国外进口粮食了. 因此, 不但没有削弱结论, 反而加强了结论. 因此B不是假设.


Perfect!

B is confusing!The contradictory of B is that the population may either increase or decrease.If the population is increasing , the contradictory of B will be a sound support. But if not,that of B will seriously undermine the argument.
So , B is a double-sword!

Appreciate comments.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-12 19:12
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部