ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

The OLEX Petroleum Company has recently determined that it could cut its refining costs by closing its Grenville refinery and consolidating all refining at its Tasberg refinery. Closing the Grenville refinery, however, would mean the immediate loss of about 1,200 jobs in the Grenville area. Eventually the lives of more than 10,000 people would be seriously disrupted. Therefore, OLEX's decision, announced yesterday, to keep Grenville open shows that at OLEX social concerns sometimes outweigh the desire for higher profits.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument given?

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4718

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2835|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教一道GWD逻辑

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2010-7-20 12:03:23 | 显示全部楼层
我觉得吧,这个题的结论是--继续开G厂不是因为利润而是因为social。weaken的话,就要提出实际上就是为了利润。只有E可以
D中厂子的工人从那里来的,跟结论无关。而且就算有关,也是support了结论,更注重social。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-9-21 12:50
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2026 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部